Hi JB,
Based on my experience, ASF slack is good only if you have an apache email
address.
If the users are not having apache email addresses, we have to add them
individually by their email address.
There is no invite link concept for users to join (
https://infra.apache.org/slack.html) to avoid
> I cannot think of any issue with storing that code in the polaris-tools
repository.
While contributing the `catalog migrator tool` to `polaris-tools`, I
encountered a challenge because this external repository needs to depend on
Apache Polaris jars, which haven't been published yet by Apache Pol
Congratulations guys. Well deserved.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 6:47 AM Prashant Singh
wrote:
> Congratulations folks, well deserved !
>
> Best,
> Prashant Singh
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:02 PM yun zou
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yun
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 a
> >
> > > Let me rename the repo (or recreate it).
> > >
> > > Thanks everyone,
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:24 AM Yufei Gu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "polaris-t
Hey, Thanks for the proposal and I agree with Yufei.
We had a backend synchronization CLI for projectNessie[1]. Maybe we can
have something similar to that instead of taking a long path of the
register table for migration between polaris instances.
[1] https://projectnessie.org/nessie-0-82-0/expo
+1 (non-binding)
1. Verified signature and checksum.
2. Local build and test passed.
- Ajantha
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 5:11 AM Eric Maynard
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Let’s cherry pick doc & other changes back into 0.10.x as needed rather
> than block the release.
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at
leanup LICENSE/NOTICE there
> > >>> - update README and cleanup other files
> > >>> It should be pretty fast and we should be able to create a PR for
> > >>> review/donation.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> JB
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 7:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As discussed with some of you, we would like to propose donating the
> > >>>> Nessie Iceberg Catalog migrator tool
> > >>>> (https://github.com/projectnessie/iceberg-catalog-migrator) to
> Apache
> > >>>> Polaris.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A SGA has been already signed in case we accept the donation.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> In terms of donation, I propose the following:
> > >>>> - the iceberg-catalog-migration can land in a separate Polaris repo
> > >>>> (as it is today for Nessie):
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris-catalog-migration or land as a
> > >>>> module in polaris repo directly
> > >>>> - we need to prepare the donation by changing the package names, etc
> > >>>> - I would suggest to consider inviting one of the main contributor
> of
> > >>>> Catalog Migrator (ajantha-bhat) as Polaris committer
> > >>>>
> > >>>> WDYT ? Do we accept the iceberg-catalog-migrator tool in Polaris (we
> > >>>> can do a formal vote if we don't have obvious consensus) ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> JB
> >
> > --
> > Robert Stupp
> > @snazy
> >
>
>
> The Nessie migrator was `iceberg-catalog-migrator`, and "catalogs" does
> not seem grammatical to me. If I'm grading papers, I'm not a papers grader,
> I'm a paper grader.
The original name, *iceberg-catalog-migrator*, suggests that it supports
migrations between any Iceberg catalogs. Since w
JB mentioned that it has to have `polaris` in the repo name.
How about calling it as `apache/*polaris-dev-tools*`? It can have an
iceberg catalog migrator CLI, Delta lake catalog migrator CLI, or something
else in the future as part of this repo.
I don't want the repo to be called just `apache/po
Hi Prashant,
It seems to me that what you are trying to do is to store scalar UDF in the
polaris catalog.
Iceberg is the best place to standardize this and store it as Iceberg UDF
(not Polaris).
Regarding the SQL syntax interoperability, we still haven't
implemented this at Iceberg.
Since UDF can
Congratulations Yun.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:31 PM Alex Dutra
wrote:
> Congratulations Yun! Glad to have you on board!
>
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > We are happy to announce Yun as new committer on the Apache Polaris
>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 3:57 PM Robert Stupp wrote:
> +1
>
> This vote is running for ~10 days now, guess it's time to count the
> votes. I only see +1s, so go ahead? ;)
>
> On 7/3/25 07:29, Ajantha Bhat wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> > I'm starting this thre
rry, I misread the date - it's July 3rd, not the 25th of the
> previous month :facepalm:
>
> On 7/4/25 12:48, Ajantha Bhat wrote:
> >> This vote is running for ~10 days now, guess it's time to count the
> > Sorry, I might have missed the other official discussio
Hi all,
While adding the recommendation to working with the PR on site docs,
we have opened an issue https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1656 to
update the settings.
I have discussed with ASF Infra and they mentioned, we can update by
ourselves.
Hence, I opened a PR for the same:
https://gith
Great milestone! Thanks everyone for contributing.
- Ajantha
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 9:57 PM yun zou wrote:
> This is fantastic news!
>
> Huge thanks to you , Yufei! Great work!
>
> Best Regards,
> Yun
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM Prashant Singh
> wrote:
>
> > Awesome news !
> > Thank y
Hello, everyone.
I'm starting this thread to discuss the possibility of changing the CI
settings for apache/polaris to only require approval for new contributors.
This will improve the experience for our contributors. We do not have
self-hosted runners, so there is no attack surface from the action
16 matches
Mail list logo
