Thanks Adnan for driving this. Left comments in the google doc.
The current schema proposal is good if this is only for Polaris internal
persistence. It'd also be a good idea to make sure it is
compatible with the Iceberg Event Endpoints [1][2].
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WtIsNGVX75-
Sorry for the late reply.
Could you clarify why you think that? It is a bit hard to provide answers
> to such feedback.
What I meant is that the PR [1] seems to provide a lot more than just
Polaris related logic, which isn't a concern of the Polaris project. It's
fine if it is trying to be a gen
