[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4)

Hi everyone, This vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Russell Spitzer, Yufei Gu, JB Onofré, Dmitri Bourlatchkov, Robert Stupp +1 (non binding): Alex Dutra Thanks everyone for your vote. I'm starting the vote on the Incubator general mailing list. Regards JB On Fri, May 23, 202

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4)

Hi everyone, The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4). We now kindly request the Incubator to review and vote for this release. Polaris community vote thread: * https://lists.apache.org/thread/fnhcmzqx81wh6j8fv5wc2m7j1xo867j5

Re: [DISCUSS] PR #1724 – Directory & package refactor for persistence modules

Hi Yufei, Thanks for opening a dev list discussion for this. Re: PR #1724 - moving "persistence" from the "extensions" sub-dir to the project root level, LGTM. However, my comment in GH about dev list discussions was more general. Since we start moving things around in one sub-tree, I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4)

As long as there is a reliable process, I don't think there's a need to do another RC. I'd recommend not deviating from the process though. That can create issues that are more likely to end up making it through the release process. On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 1:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Y

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4)

By the way, I wrote a release guide to explain the whole process: https://polaris.apache.org/community/release-guide/ Regards JB Le ven. 30 mai 2025 à 19:55, Ryan Blue a écrit : > As long as there is a reliable process, I don't think there's a need to do > another RC. I'd recommend not deviati

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4)

Fully agree. Let’s close rc4 vote here and move to the incubator vote. Thanks ! Regards JB Le ven. 30 mai 2025 à 19:55, Ryan Blue a écrit : > As long as there is a reliable process, I don't think there's a need to do > another RC. I'd recommend not deviating from the process though. That can

Re: [DISCUSS] Behavior of custom metadata location

Hi Liam, Thanks for starting this discussion! To clarity: Does a view with a custom location work in Polaris if the location is a subpath inside allowedLocations? Thanks, Dmitri. On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:57 PM Liam Bao wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to bring up a discussion around the ex