Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-06 Thread Dennis Huo
+1 (binding) 1. Verified checksums 2. Verified running server binary distribution with run.sh and configuration overrides, feature flags per instructions under https://polaris.apache.org/in-dev/unreleased/configuration/ On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:35 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Adnan > >

Re: Merge module polaris-quarkus-admin and polaris-quarkus-server

2025-05-06 Thread Dmitri Bourlatchkov
Thanks for the clarification, JB! Packaging both the server and the admin tool in the same distribution (archive) is certainly a good idea. Cheers, Dmitri. On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 2:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi > > We can see two aspects here: > - the merge of the applications > - gat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - checksum and signature are good on the source distribution - in the source distribution, some files don't contain ASF header but expected (like version.txt, etc) - no binary file found in the source distribution - LICENSE and NOTICE looks good in the source distribution -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-06 Thread Prashant Singh
+1 1. Verified checksums, signature, artifacts 2. did manual testing with admin and server, works well ! Best, Prashant Singh On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 7:52 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - checksum and signature are good on the source distribution > - in the sourc

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate Eclipse Link and make Relational JDBC as default

2025-05-06 Thread Dmitri Bourlatchkov
I'd propose to convert all existing tests that use a Postgres database to JDBC. Then (in the same PR) add dedicated integration tests for EclipseLink following the same approach that was used for JDBC ITs. This ensures that EclipseLink is covered by the normative Polaris "integration-tests". At t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-06 Thread Honah J.
+1 (non-binding) 1. Verified signatures and checksums 2. Build and local tests all look good. Best, Jonas On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:44 AM Prashant Singh wrote: > +1 > > 1. Verified checksums, signature, artifacts > 2. did manual testing with admin and server, works well ! > > Best, > Prashant S

Re: Merge module polaris-quarkus-admin and polaris-quarkus-server

2025-05-06 Thread Yufei Gu
Other than duplicated downloads for shared jars, the big problem is that the configuration difference between admin tool and server may cause server issues, e.g., the admin tool may bootstrap a realm in a wrong database. Let's move them into the same distribution package first. Then we can conside