Re: Switch to Quarkus Security

Hi Mike, My current work makes it possible to define if the authentication is *internal* (using the internal token endpoint + custom auth mechanism) or *external* (using an external IDP + Quarkus OIDC extension). Furthermore, the authentication can be defined on a global level, *then overridden o

Polaris SNAPSHOT available and nightly build

Hi folks, I received several requests to get Polaris SNAPSHOT artifacts published (to build external tools, or from polaris-tools repo). I did a first SNAPSHOT deployment: https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/polaris/ I also created a PR to have a GH Action for night

Re: Polaris SNAPSHOT available and nightly build

Great news! On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi folks, > > I received several requests to get Polaris SNAPSHOT artifacts > published (to build external tools, or from polaris-tools repo). > > I did a first SNAPSHOT deployment: > https://repository.apache.org/content

Re: Pull requests against polaris-tools

Hi, The LDAP group is the same. What's missing on polaris-tools is the .github/CODEOWNERS (used to auto assign reviewers). I will add it. Regards JB On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 6:31 PM Pierre Laporte wrote: > > Hi folks > > I am going to open a few PR against the polaris-tools repository to improv

Pull requests against polaris-tools

Hi folks I am going to open a few PR against the polaris-tools repository to improve benchmarks, especially regarding update-related workloads. I opened a new PR but noticed that, unlike with the PR against `apache/polaris`, nobody is automatically added as reviewer when a pull request is created

Re: Pull requests against polaris-tools

By the way, do you also want other resources (like renovate config) ? I guess not, but wanted to double check. Regards JB On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 6:31 PM Pierre Laporte wrote: > > Hi folks > > I am going to open a few PR against the polaris-tools repository to improve > benchmarks, especially r

Re: Switch to Quarkus Security

Hi again, As a follow-up, I was able today to make it possible for each realm to be dynamically authenticated by either the internal token endpoint, or any of the configured OIDC tenants. So, I take back my previous statement about the impossibility to mix internal and external authentication for

Re: Switch to Quarkus Security

Very slick. Thanks for the extra flexibility. Looking forward to the PR Mike On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 12:54 PM Alex Dutra wrote: > Hi again, > > As a follow-up, I was able today to make it possible for each realm to be > dynamically authenticated by either the internal token endpoint, or any of

Re: Polaris-XTable Proposal

Hi all, Based on the last community sync discussion, there were a couple of action items that we wanted to get clarification on for integration of Apache Polaris with Apache XTable to support table formats such as Delta and Apache Hudi. 1. The first item was defining a *Table Converter* Interface

Re: [DISCUSS] Polaris Federated Principals and Roles

Hey folks Some of you already know that I posted an initial PR to get federated principals/roles added. One thing that came out of the feedback was a spec change to make it clear when federated identities can be used in the APIs. Notably, federated principals cannot be created or updated, but can