Congratulations!
Best Regards,
Yun
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 4:28 PM Michael Collado
wrote:
> Wow! Awesome news. Congrats folks!
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:47 PM Russell Spitzer >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi y'all!
> >
> > I'm excited to let the Polaris Community know that the PPMC has added
>
Hi all,
Just wanted to say thanks to the community for reviewing the Polaris-XTable
proposal and providing helpful thoughts and feedback! Thanks Eric also for
sharing your doc, appreciate that others in the community were exploring
this idea.
Thanks Yun for bringing up these questions, will try t
There are still open concerns about the incompatibility w/ Servlet Spec
6.0, which can be a problem. That will be changed/addressed in Iceberg's
v2 REST spec. But I do not see a good reason to _introduce_ this in
Polaris APIs, knowing that it is an issue.
The other topic is "OAuth" - there is
Congrats all! Thanks for all you do for the Polaris community!
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:55 AM Honah J. wrote:
> Congratulations! Well deserved!
>
> Best regards,
> Honah (Jonas)
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:48 AM Anurag Mantripragada
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations all. Great work!
> >
> >
>
Hi Eric
I agree. I propose:
1. To update the contributor good practices on the website to clearly state
the keywords nit and minor.
2. For request change, we can use it. For the record, we can bypass request
change flag if a given number of reviewers approve the PR anyway.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
Hi folks,
Thanks for the feedback and discussion so far. Based on our PR discussion
about naming, we’ve simplified “namespace-path” to “namespace” for clarity.
Please continue to vote.
Thanks,
Honah (Jonas)
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 8:22 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote:
> Thanks for the update Hona
+1 LGTM.
Cheers,
Dmitri.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:30 AM Dennis Huo wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We've had some productive discussion in various places on the mailing list,
> in the github PR, and in the live community sync now about the initial
> minimal updates to the Polaris REST API (under the
By the way, what do you think about adding the maturity model as
GitHub Discussion (as we have the roadmap) ?
Please let me know and I will do that.
Thanks!
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 6:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Some of you asked me: "what should we do heading