Sounds good!
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:38 AM Pierre Laporte
wrote:
> Ok so it seems there is a consensus. The benchmarks can be written in
> Scala as long as they are contributed to the tools repository. I just
> closed the initial PR that was against the `apache/polaris` repository and
> open
Ok so it seems there is a consensus. The benchmarks can be written in
Scala as long as they are contributed to the tools repository. I just
closed the initial PR that was against the `apache/polaris` repository and
opened a new one against the `apache/polaris-tools` repository (
https://github.co
Thank you Dennis and Eric.
I agree whenever we introduce (2) in BasePersistence we should definitely
re:think if this is a query pattern
that can be supported by most of the DBs (Relational / NoSQL) before
accepting it for BasePersistence.
Presently this specific change is not gonna introduce any
Hi Prashant
If JsonB is PostgreSQL/JDBC specific, it makes sense to me as it's
implementation specific., so +1 from my side.
We should stay "abstract" in BasePersistence (and other interfaces).
If backward compatibility is good to have, it's best effort. Same for
zero downtime. We can do our best
Using JSONB in the PostgreSQL-specific implementation sounds reasonable to
me.
My impression from the in-progress PRs on this subject is that the effort
is focused
on PostgreSQL and reusing the SQL schema in different RDBMS systems is not
actually expected (or planned).
On the topic of compatibil
Hi Pierre,
Thanks !
I will take a look at the new PR :)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:38 PM Pierre Laporte wrote:
>
> Ok so it seems there is a consensus. The benchmarks can be written in
> Scala as long as they are contributed to the tools repository. I just
> closed the initial PR th
