+1
It makes sense to me.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 8:54 PM Yufei Gu wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm proposing to rename the table maintenance policy "snapshot-retention"
> to "snapshot-expiry". While "snapshot-retention" is a reasonable name, it's
> a bit too general. I believe "snapshot-
Hey folks,
I wanted to propose this feature to Apache Polaris Rolling back
replacements operation snapshots in the case during the concurrent write
(compaction and other writers trying to commit to the table at the same
time) to Iceberg there are conflicts. This is a feature which Ryan proposed
as
Hi folks,
I'm proposing to rename the table maintenance policy "snapshot-retention"
to "snapshot-expiry". While "snapshot-retention" is a reasonable name, it's
a bit too general. I believe "snapshot-expiry" more precisely captures the
intent of the policy, which is specifically about removing expi