Thanks JB for driving this!
The tool serves a very specific purpose and is not directly tied to any
specific catalog. CI for it is different. It makes a lot of sense to have it in
a separate GitHub repository - that also eases the migration to the ASF. If
more functionality is added to the migr
Just want to note that there are still a lot of things to do before.
WRT “production readiness”, as JB said, we need consensus on some things
_quickly_. The details can only be sorted out _with_ a consensus. April is
therefore too tight IMHO - I’d really prefer the date: “it’s ready, when it’s
+1
IIRC there is a (currently hidden) page
--
Robert Stupp
@snazy
--
Robert Stupp
@snazy
> Am 11.02.2025 um 14:31 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Related to the email about releases sent by Yufei, I would like to
> propose to add our current proposals on the website.
>
> I
Related to the “production readiness”, we all agreed a while ago on focusing on
bugs, stability and everything around that.
I propose to really focus on those things instead of new functionality, because
features require a "rock solid” foundation. Once we have that, we can resume
work on new fea
I like the idea of a label to identify the blockers for 1.0.0 (or maybe
just using milestones could be enough).
For automatic release, it’s clearly on path. I don’t consider this required
for 1.0.0 (1.0.0 release can be done manually) but good to have.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
Le mer. 12 févr. 2025 à
Thanks, Robert, for chiming in. Production readiness is indeed a crucial
point, and I'm open to any proposals that can help us achieve it. I also
believe this is the right time to identify any blockers. To help with
tracking, I'd suggest we add a dedicated label so we can tag related issues
and PRs
+1 for a link to the github issue with the "proposal" tag
Yufei
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:55 AM Robert Stupp wrote:
> +1
>
> IIRC there is a (currently hidden) page
>
> --
> Robert Stupp
> @snazy
>
>
> --
> Robert Stupp
> @snazy
> > Am 11.02.2025 um 14:31 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> >
> >
Hi folks
This vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Ryan Blue, JB Onofré, Tyler Akidau, Robert Stupp
+1 (non binding): Yufei Gu, Dmitri Bourlatchkov
I'm now starting a new vote on gene...@incubator.apache.org for IPMC.
Thanks everyone for your vote!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Feb 6, 20
Hi folks,
This is a call for the vote to release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5.
The Polaris community has voted and approved Apache Polaris
(incubating) 0.9.0-rc5.
We are now asking the IPMC to review and vote for this release.
Polaris community vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thre
