Thanks for pushing this forward, Dennis!
For visibility: I approved the PR on GitHub.
If anyone has any comments or concerns that we did not cover so far, please
reply here or on the PR.
As a follow-up, I guess we need a separate discussion about handling
secrets in Polaris in general, which wil
Thanks for the comments! Yes I agree we'll probably want to adjust the API,
and we can definitely try to start with some reasonable placeholder around
auth/secrets to unblock various parallel streams of work on federation
while keeping an eye on how different secrets/auth models can be
accommodated
Thanks, Dennis, for starting this discussion.
As for me the PR looks ok in its current state, although I posted a few
comments.
I tend to think that in order to proceed with the federated catalogs
implementation, it is probably best to merge the PR now and later rework
the parts that deal with ex
