The vote failed: we have a veto from one PPMC member.
So I close the vote and don’t do any change on renovatebot config.
Regards
JB
Le lun. 3 mars 2025 à 19:04, Eric Maynard a
écrit :
> Is this vote closed?
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:53 AM Eric Maynard
> wrote:
>
> > > Weekly updates will
Is this vote closed?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:53 AM Eric Maynard
wrote:
> > Weekly updates will _increase_ the amount of "noise" ... If all people
> are fine with more noise, let's go for it
>
> That does seem to be what the votes reflect.
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:11 AM Dmitri Bourlatchko
> Weekly updates will _increase_ the amount of "noise" ... If all people
are fine with more noise, let's go for it
That does seem to be what the votes reflect.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:11 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> What was probably not considered at all: Weekly updates will _increase_
>
What was probably not considered at all: Weekly updates will _increase_
the amount of "noise". Just think about it: Renovate creates all updates
at once - once one change is merged, Renovate will rebase/recreate all
other updates, CI will run again for all the other updates.
Do we have to rebase
The vote is only about weekly schedule (not grouping). I mentioned grouping
to reduce the number of PRs but I’m more in favor of keeping atomic PRs.
Regards
JB
Le mar. 25 févr. 2025 à 11:09, Robert Stupp a écrit :
>
> On 24.02.25 10:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > As your
On 24.02.25 10:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Robert,
As your vote is binding, and this vote is a code modification change,
it basically means veto.
Let me try to convince you to revert your vote ;)
You are maybe right about the noise, but worth a try. I think that
grouping + weekly sched
Hi Robert,
As your vote is binding, and this vote is a code modification change,
it basically means veto.
Let me try to convince you to revert your vote ;)
You are maybe right about the noise, but worth a try. I think that
grouping + weekly schedule should reduce the noise.
About keeping depende
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I know it's a hot topic, but I would like to avoid any frustration in
> our community.
>
> Before the vote, let me put some context.
>
> To manage our dependency updates, we are using renovatebo
Keeping dependencies up-to-date is mandatory to get bug and security
fixes as fast as possible and avoid piling up tech debt and CVEs from
outdated dependencies.
Moving to a weekly schedule would _not_ reduce that noise but instead
_increase_ it and imply _more_ work to the few persons who dea
+1
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:31 AM Eric Maynard
wrote:
> Obligatory +1 as it's my issue -- I'm also open to less frequent.
>
> My pitch: This is an upper bound on how often we update dependencies, not a
> lower bound. If an actual person sees an actual reason to update a
> dependency, they can
+0. I'd prefer an even less frequent one, like bi-weekly schedule.
Yufei
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:54 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> By the way, the vote runs for 72 hours.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I know it
Obligatory +1 as it's my issue -- I'm also open to less frequent.
My pitch: This is an upper bound on how often we update dependencies, not a
lower bound. If an actual person sees an actual reason to update a
dependency, they can and should still do that :)
--EM
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 9:27 AM A
+0 as well, I am not bothered by Renovate at all personally.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:16 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
wrote:
> +0 -- Renovate "noise" does not bother me personally, but I'm ok with less
> frequent updates.
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 8:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1
I don't see the value in the noise from the current config. I'm not opposed
to bi-weekly as Yufei suggests either, but I see weekly as a strict
improvement, so am +1 on this vote.
-Tyler
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:41 AM Yufei Gu wrote:
> +0. I'd prefer an even less frequent one, like bi-we
+0 -- Renovate "noise" does not bother me personally, but I'm ok with less
frequent updates.
Cheers,
Dmitri.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 8:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I know it's a hot topic, but I would like to avoid any frustration in
> our community.
>
> Before the vote, le
By the way, the vote runs for 72 hours.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I know it's a hot topic, but I would like to avoid any frustration in
> our community.
>
> Before the vote, let me put some context.
>
> To manage our dependency updat
Hi folks,
I know it's a hot topic, but I would like to avoid any frustration in
our community.
Before the vote, let me put some context.
To manage our dependency updates, we are using renovatebot.
The current renovatebot configuration uses "at any time" schedule
(e.g. * * * * * cron), except for
17 matches
Mail list logo
