Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-02 Thread Yufei Gu
Thanks Dennis for flagging this. Good news is that it's a clean cherry-pick. Cancelling RC5, will cut RC6 with the fix( https://github.com/apache/polaris/commit/22eaff4fed431715ec8efc8c749a1707c99c48e7 ). Yufei On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 11:49 PM Dennis Huo wrote: > -1 (binding) > > Given the natu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-01 Thread Dennis Huo
-1 (binding) Given the nature of the broken "list" operations in federation towards usability and the fairly straightforward already-merged fix to pick, my vote is to cut a new RC6 for the fix. On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 11:22 PM Dennis Huo wrote: > Sorry for surfacing this late, but I hadn't notic

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-01 Thread Dennis Huo
Sorry for surfacing this late, but I hadn't noticed https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1848 before (already fixed at head by Rulin's https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1849) I can't remember whether we formally considered Federation bugs to be 1.0 blockers, but it's one of the big featur

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-01 Thread Prashant Singh
+1 (non binding) I verified the following: - Source tarball (shasum and GPG signature) - Build and test - Verified server binary distribution - basic sanity testing with JDBC persistence layer Thank you Yufei ! Bests, Prashant On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 9:47 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - Source distribution -- incubating is in the version -- signature and checksum are good -- DISCLAIMER is present -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good (personally, I think NOTICE should not mention Nessie as it's just the copyright and already in the LICENSE, but one IPMC asked t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-01 Thread William Hyun
+1 (non-binding) I verified the following: - Source tarball (shasum and GPG signature) - Build and test - Verified server binary distribution Bests, William On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:54 PM yun zou wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > I tested the spark client using both --packages and --jars optio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-01 Thread Yufei Gu
+1(binding) 1. Signatures and Checksums are all good 2. Both admin-tool and server in the binary distribution run well. 3. Helm chart sign and checksum are good. Yufei On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:54 PM yun zou wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I tested the spark client using both --packages and --ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-07-01 Thread yun zou
+1 (non-binding) I tested the spark client using both --packages and --jars options, tested operations: 1) create/insert values for both delta and iceberg tables 2) create/drop namespaces 3) create/drop iceberg and delta tables Things turned out to work accordingly. Best Regards, Yun On Mon, Ju

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC5)

2025-06-30 Thread Yufei Gu
Hi everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating release. This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc5 * https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc5 * https://github.com/apache/polaris/tre