FYI, I opened several PRs:
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1560
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1561
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1562
* https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1565
I'm doing a new full pass. Can you please take a look on these PRs ?
I will cherry-pic
Hi folks,
As you might have noticed on the general incubator mailing list, we
missed some fixes in RC2.
I'm working on PRs to fix the reported issues. I will start RC3 when fixed.
Regards
JB
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> due to a mistake in the
Hi folks,
due to a mistake in the admin distribution LICENSE, I cancel this RC
and I will submit/fix a new one.
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 2:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of
> Apache Polaris 0.10.0-b
Hi Ryan
This release includes:
1. source distribution (as in the 0.9.0 release) available on dist
2. binary artifacts:
2.1. jar files (stage on Nexus): there's no uber jar, the stage jar
files include LICENSE/NOTICE
2.2. binary distributions: that's the polaris-server and polaris-admin
archives (a
JB, can you help us understand what is in this release?
Since this is the first one with binaries, I went to check licenses in the
Jar files. The first one that I checked was a runtime bundle. It had extra
license files from other projects, and the project's LICENSE didn't reflect
the contents of
Hi
Casting my +1 (binding) from podling vote.
Regards
JB
Le mer. 7 mai 2025 à 14:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of
> Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2).
> We now kindly request the IPMC members (and
Hi everyone,
The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of
Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2).
We now kindly request the IPMC members (and everyone) to review and
vote for this release.
Polaris community vote thread:
* https://lists.apache.org/thread/d0ywnzmp481f1p0l
Hi everyone,
Thanks everyone who participated in the vote for Release Apache
Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2).
The vote result is:
+1: 5 (binding) 5 (non binding)
0: 0 (binding) 0 (non binding)
-1: 0 (binding) 0 (binding)
I'm starting the vote on the Incubator general mailing list.
Thanks
+1 (non-binding)
1. Verified signatures and checksums
2. Build and local tests all look good.
Best,
Jonas
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:44 AM Prashant Singh
wrote:
> +1
>
> 1. Verified checksums, signature, artifacts
> 2. did manual testing with admin and server, works well !
>
> Best,
> Prashant S
+1
1. Verified checksums, signature, artifacts
2. did manual testing with admin and server, works well !
Best,
Prashant Singh
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 7:52 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - checksum and signature are good on the source distribution
> - in the sourc
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- checksum and signature are good on the source distribution
- in the source distribution, some files don't contain ASF header but
expected (like version.txt, etc)
- no binary file found in the source distribution
- LICENSE and NOTICE looks good in the source distribution
-
+1 (binding)
1. Verified checksums
2. Verified running server binary distribution with run.sh and
configuration overrides, feature flags per instructions under
https://polaris.apache.org/in-dev/unreleased/configuration/
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:35 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Adnan
>
>
Hi Adnan
I think the documentation on the source distribution/release branch is
fine with the release (it's valid and works imho).
Improvement on the documentation can be included in the next release.
Regards
JB
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:39 PM Adnan Hemani
wrote:
>
> This makes sense to me - bu
+1 (non-binding)
1. Verified signature and checksum.
2. Local build and test passed.
- Ajantha
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 5:11 AM Eric Maynard
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Let’s cherry pick doc & other changes back into 0.10.x as needed rather
> than block the release.
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at
+1 (non-binding)
Let’s cherry pick doc & other changes back into 0.10.x as needed rather
than block the release.
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 2:40 PM Adnan Hemani
wrote:
> This makes sense to me - but the 0.10 release tag would not line up with
> the shell scripts included in that release if we only
This makes sense to me - but the 0.10 release tag would not line up with the
shell scripts included in that release if we only changed the docs. But if we
are following up quickly with 1.0 after this release, then that’s also fair.
This is not absolutely critical if we are only waiting another f
I think it's also perfectly fine to change docs after the release. We would
do so if we had better
descriptions or bug fixes, so I don't see why we couldn't do that for
better how-to guides
as long as the information applied to 0.10.
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 4:31 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote:
> Hi
Hi Adnan,
I believe the plan is to follow with 1.0 immediately after 0.10.0 is
released (as discussed in the community call last week). We should
certainly include doc changes there... but I do not think they are critical
for another 0.10.0 RC. In fact, making another RC will delay 1.0 under the
c
+1 (binding)
Verified:
* Checksums (binaries and helm)
* Signatures (binaries and helm)
* helm install from tar (
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/0.10.0-beta-incubating.tar.gz
)
- it works, so I guess the index.yaml issue (below) is minor
- image pull fails
(Non-Binding) -1: I think 0.10.0 release would be very positively impacted by
having the remaining pieces of the Getting Started with Cloud Providers (Using
Blob Storage) - this PR: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1435. I
understand this was committed past the cut-off, but having it part
The helm chart's index appears to be mostly empty... Is that correct?
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/index.yaml
apiVersion: v1
entries: {}
generated: "2025-05-02T22:14:21.384267+02:00"
Thanks,
Dmitri.
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 12:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wr
+1 (binding)
1. ➜ apache-polaris-0.10.0-beta-incubating shasum -a 512 --check *.sha512
apache-polaris-0.10.0-beta-incubating.tar.gz: OK
polaris-quarkus-admin-0.10.0-beta-incubating.tgz: OK
polaris-quarkus-admin-0.10.0-beta-incubating.zip: OK
polaris-quarkus-server-0.10.0-beta-incubating.tgz: OK
p
+1
1. Verified asc, sha512.
2. Build and test passed.
3. Verified both binary distributions, admin and server. Both worked.
Would suggest putting both binaries in a package. They are easier to use in
that case.
Yufei
On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 9:39 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
Hi everyone,
Following the fixes done on RC1, I propose that we release the
following RC (RC2) as the official Apache Polaris
0.10.0-beta-incubating release.
* This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-0.10.0-beta-incubating-rc2
*
https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-0.10.0
24 matches
Mail list logo
