Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: Improve branding and user experience of Polaris' website

2025-10-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Yes it’s definitely a great work ! I did a first review on the PR and I love it Regards JB Le mer. 15 oct. 2025 à 18:59, Yufei Gu a écrit : > I got the chance to see the preview. It looks really good. Thanks for > driving this, Scott! > > Yufei > > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 3:02 PM Scott Teal

Proposal: Iceberg REST Catalog Terraform Provider

2025-10-15 Thread Alex Stephen
Hello, I wanted to cross-post a proposal that I'm making to the Iceberg community. We're proposing creating a Terraform provider that can connect to an arbitrary Iceberg REST Catalog and be used to manage namespaces/tables/views. There's a lot of potential to extend this to the Polaris community

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: Improve branding and user experience of Polaris' website

2025-10-15 Thread Yufei Gu
I got the chance to see the preview. It looks really good. Thanks for driving this, Scott! Yufei On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 3:02 PM Scott Teal wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Since the Polaris site was first stood up, there have been many new > user-facing features and improvements. Documentation has a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.2.0-incubating (rc1)

2025-10-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
-1 (binding) I checked: - Source distribution -- incubating is in the version/name -- hash and checksum are good -- DISCLAIMER is present -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good -- File headers are correct -- No binary file found in the distribution - Binary distribution -- incubating is in the version/nam

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.2.0-incubating (rc1)

2025-10-15 Thread Pierre Laporte
+1 (non-binding) Verified: 1 - Checksums and signatures 2 - Build passed 3 - Bootstrap and run Polaris 4 - Run a sample benchmark with the JDBC persistence to create catalogs and entities -- Pierre On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 1:43 PM Robert Stupp wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Did check: > * Reproduc

Re: [VOTE] to use apache-polaris as official Apache Polaris Python package name

2025-10-15 Thread Russell Spitzer
+1 (binding) On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 7:59 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Since this vote is for a name that ends up in code, I propose to use the > consensus approval [1] process (at least 3 binding votes, no vetoes) and a > 72 hour minimum voting time window. > > [1] https://w

Re: [DISCUSS] Discussion on pagination of non-IRC APIs

2025-10-15 Thread Dmitri Bourlatchkov
Hi Eric, I agree with your points. What worries me in the Iceberg spec is this statement: "Clients may initiate the first paginated request by sending an empty query parameter `pageToken` to the server." I think it implies that a client that does not send a pageToken parameter can expect to get

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.2.0-incubating (rc1)

2025-10-15 Thread Robert Stupp
+1 (binding) Did check: * Reproducible build: binary contents of staged archives and locally build artifacts are equal (except for the known differences mentioned in https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2204) * Signatures/checksums * Local build Verified against https://repository.apache.org/

Re: Python client: remove Python 3.9 support #2795

2025-10-15 Thread Honah J.
+1, thanks for driving this! Best, Jonas On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 21:29 Yong Zheng wrote: > Python 3.9 will be EOL by the end of the month ( > https://peps.python.org/pep-0596/). Raise this PR to drop it once we are > ready. PR: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2795 >

[PROPOSAL] Introducing Entity "tag" and ABAC

2025-10-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, Maybe you know, I'm working on an Iceberg component for Apache Camel. I have a first version that works and I implemented a simple route consuming from a Kafka topic, processing the Kafka record and inserting data into Iceberg tables. The component is able to "dynamically" create Iceberg