Since all the artifacts are going to change their names when Polaris
graduates (hopefully) I don’t think we should over index on having
everything settled at this moment
Given that this is part of an experimental feature it doesn’t seem to me
like it’s worth delaying the release for alignment on
Hi Yufei (as a release manager for 1.0.0):
Even though RC6 has approving votes so far, let's resolve this concern
(quoted below) before closing the vote.
Thanks,
Dmitri.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 9:48 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote:
> Good point, Robert! I missed the artifact name change while revi
+1 to documenting "IMPLICIT" both in YAML comments (briefly, in PR 1925)
and in Polaris docs (from the end user's perspective).
Thanks,
Dmitri.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 6:37 AM Robert Stupp wrote:
> AFAIU `IMPLICIT` means that Polaris does not explicitly configure any
> auth related settings, but
Good point, Robert! I missed the artifact name change while reviewing
PR 1991.
With RC6 this Spark option worked for me (no classifier):
--packages org.apache.polaris:polaris-spark-3.5_2.12:1.0.0-incubating
In RC6 the bundle jar (polaris-spark-3.5_2.12-1.0.0-incubating-bundle.jar)
is under the
I haven't checked the release yet due to other things on my plate.
With PR #1991 (Add polaris-spark-bundle project to help packing and
publish the Spark Client shadow Jar) [1], the Maven coordinates of the
Spark plugin will change pretty much immediately after 1.0.0, which is
relevant when usi
Argh, sorry, I misread the date - it's July 3rd, not the 25th of the
previous month :facepalm:
On 7/4/25 12:48, Ajantha Bhat wrote:
This vote is running for ~10 days now, guess it's time to count the
Sorry, I might have missed the other official discussion. I officially
started this vote thre
I'd really prefer to not add "anything Hive" to Polaris itself, and I'd
really like to see Hadoop being removed entirely from the Polaris code base.
There are multiple reasons for this:
1. The Iceberg project would rather like to remove all catalogs except
the REST catalog. (That's at least wh
> This vote is running for ~10 days now, guess it's time to count the
Sorry, I might have missed the other official discussion. I officially
started this vote thread on July 3rd.
That said, we do have enough binding votes. (+1: 4, -1: 0, 0:0).
Therefore the vote has passed.
- Ajantha
On Fri, Ju
AFAIU `IMPLICIT` means that Polaris does not explicitly configure any
auth related settings, but implementations still leverage external
sources (system-properties and environment and files and
container-configuration endpoints and what not).
That's generally fine for me.
I'd just like to hig
+1
This vote is running for ~10 days now, guess it's time to count the
votes. I only see +1s, so go ahead? ;)
On 7/3/25 07:29, Ajantha Bhat wrote:
Hello, everyone.
I'm starting this thread to discuss the possibility of changing the CI
settings for apache/polaris to only require approval for n
10 matches
Mail list logo
