Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC4)

Hi JB, Helm Chart has its own format called *.tgz.prov file, which includes both checksum and signature, which you can find here, https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/1.0.0-incubating/polaris-1.0.0-incubating.tgz.prov ygu@FM4LQ4GJ90 Downloads % cat polaris-1.0.0-incu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC4)

Hi Yufei Can you please add checksum and signature for the Helm Chart package (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/polaris/helm-chart/1.0.0-incubating/) ? All artifacts part of a release (hosted on dist repo) have to be signed and checksum has to be provided, else the release is "inv

[Polaris Community Sync] Jun 26, 2025

Hi, Thanks to everyone who joined the Polaris community meeting this week. Here's the record: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15xPXCGVSKmfc5HWI4CYbfiBC5HnUtR16/view?usp=sharing The website will be updated soon. Regards JB

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding endpoint to AwsStorageConfigInfo

I added a separate STS endpoint property to https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1913 Cheers, Dmitri. On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 7:59 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, Adnan! > > I was initially thinking of deferring separating STS and S3 endpoints to a > later PR, but giv

Re: AWS S3 KMS support in Polaris

Thanks Ashok for working on this! Sorry for the late reply. Will review it over the weekend. Yufei On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 5:02 AM Ashok Borra wrote: > Hi Yufei, > > Sorry for the delay. I added support for feature flag for a safe rollout. > > Could you please review the PR >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

Thanks for the reporting. It's more a feature request, which should not be a release blocker. Yufei On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 4:27 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > Found: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1973 > > I guess it's not a blocker, though. > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Fri, Jun 27,

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC4)

Hi everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating release. This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc4 * https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc4 * https://github.com/apache/polaris/tre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

Found: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1973 I guess it's not a blocker, though. Cheers, Dmitri. On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 3:09 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Polaris > 1.0.0-incubating release. > > This corresponds

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

We found a typo in one license header. I'll go ahead and cancel RC3 and cut RC4 shortly. The Apache license check tool(RAT) isn't so strict on typo or even missing certain lines. Maybe that's something we can improve. Thanks again for the collaboration and patience! Yufei On Fri, Jun 27, 2025

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

Hi everyone, I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating release. This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc3 * https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-1.0.0-incubating-rc3 * https://github.com/apache/polaris/tre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0-incubating (RC2)

Hi folks, The license issue has been resolved in PR #1950 , big thanks to Russell for driving the fix, and to everyone who helped with the review. We also addressed a missing license in PR #1968 . I'm excit

Re: [DISCUSS] Do not serialize null properties in API

+1 On 26.06.25 23:55, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: Hi All, Posting for visibility. In PR [1955] I propose to avoid serializing null property values to clients. This change does have some risk of breaking existing clients, but the risk is minimal IMHO. Only clients that rely on observing explici