Re: [DISCUSS] Preparing 0.10.0 release including binary distributions

Thanks guys for the feedback. @Yufei, what do you think about 0.10.0 release then ? If we don't find a consensus on versioning, then, let's focus on the 1.0.0 release directly. I would like to remind the purpose of the 0.10.0/1.0.0-preview release purpose: - include binary distributions - includ

Re: Polaris benchmarks proposal

Hi Eric That's a good point. I think that it's something we can manage with each tool in a separate folder/module. And, I'm sure we will find a solution if/when the problem will occur :) Regards JB On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 5:51 PM Eric Maynard wrote: > > +1 to what JB said. > > My concern with S

Re: Polaris has two websites

I pinged the responsible folks On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 3:40 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > Thanks, Anna! > > I see that https://polaris.io redirects to https://polaris.apache.org/ > alright. > > However, http://polaris.io (no TLS) responds with a 500 error. > > It's a minor issue, but it would

Re: [DISCUSS] Initial location for Spark Client

I'm not convinced that keeping it in the main repo is necessary but I don't think that's really important at this time. I think it's simple enough to move the code out later if we find that we've run up against some other limitations of testing or releasing. So I'm fine with beginning in the main r

[DISCUSS] Release cycle for Spark Client

Hi Team, Given that we are now introducing Spark Client, one thing we need to decide is the release cycle for the Spark Plugin. I propose to bundle the client release with Polaris main release like Iceberg. In that way, users will be able to get the client support for new APIs in the same release

Re: Polaris has two websites

Thanks, Anna! I see that https://polaris.io redirects to https://polaris.apache.org/ alright. However, http://polaris.io (no TLS) responds with a 500 error. It's a minor issue, but it would be nice to fix it :) Thanks, Dmitri. $ curl -v http://polaris.io/ * Trying 104.18.21.161:80... *

[DISCUSS] Initial location for Spark Client

Hi Team, Along with the support of Generic Table, we are also introducing a Polaris Spark client to interact with the new APIs. To start the work, I propose to put the client in the Polaris main repo for now. As we proceed, we can decide whether to move it to a different repo depending on the com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improve our "collaboration schema"

In this case I think rather than a mistake, there could simply be some ambiguity around what comments are considered blocking. For example, I'm not sure if a comment prefixed "minor" should be considered blocking -- I would say probably not, but someone else could interpret it differently. To that

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for Catalog Federation - addition of ConnnectionConfigInto to ExternalCatalog

+1 (non-binding) Best, Rulin

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for Catalog Federation - addition of ConnnectionConfigInto to ExternalCatalog

+1 Best, Yun On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 9:22 AM Honah J. wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Honah (Jonas) > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:22 AM Yufei Gu wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Yufei > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:03 AM Prashant Singh > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Bes

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for Catalog Federation - addition of ConnnectionConfigInto to ExternalCatalog

+1 (non-binding) Best, Honah (Jonas) On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:22 AM Yufei Gu wrote: > +1 > > Yufei > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:03 AM Prashant Singh > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best, > > Prashant > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:01 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for Catalog Federation - addition of ConnnectionConfigInto to ExternalCatalog

+1 Yufei On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:03 AM Prashant Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Prashant > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:01 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov > wrote: > > > +1 LGTM. > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:30 AM Dennis Huo wrote: > > > > > Hello all, >

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for Catalog Federation - addition of ConnnectionConfigInto to ExternalCatalog

+1 (non-binding) Best, Prashant On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:01 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > +1 LGTM. > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:30 AM Dennis Huo wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > We've had some productive discussion in various places on the mailing > list, > > in the g

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for Catalog Federation - addition of ConnnectionConfigInto to ExternalCatalog

+1 On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 4:07 AM Robert Stupp wrote: > Hey Dennis, > > +1 on your proposal and thanks for especially marking it as > "experimental, subject to change". > > On 25.03.25 05:28, Dennis Huo wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > We've had some productive discussion in various places on the

Re: [VOTE] REST API changes for Catalog Federation - addition of ConnnectionConfigInto to ExternalCatalog

Hey Dennis, +1 on your proposal and thanks for especially marking it as "experimental, subject to change". On 25.03.25 05:28, Dennis Huo wrote: Hello all, We've had some productive discussion in various places on the mailing list, in the github PR, and in the live community sync now about th