Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Polaris powered by Quarkus

2024-11-26 Thread Dmitri Bourlatchkov
Hi Mike, I had a brief, but end-to-end look at your latest HK2 branch. Overall, I think it is a good refactoring. I see that it uses standard jakarta annotations in most places, which should work fine with Quarkus too (as Alex already mentioned). I wonder whether implementing the HK2 Factory int

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Polaris powered by Quarkus

2024-11-26 Thread Michael Collado
This sounds great. I think we can agree on some strategies so that work can keep moving forward even as we're settling on the framework question: 1. Let's continue to rely on the interfaces we already have defined - e.g., the PolarisConfigurationStore is going to continue to be the mechanism for q

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Polaris powered by Quarkus

2024-11-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Mike Fully agree, I just wanted to remind that CDI is a good think, but considering ecosystem/plugins is also key (and indeed decoupled from CDI). I think we already have a kind of consensus about CDI, and agree to move forward here with improvement of the current codebase. The reason why I m