https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
Bug ID: 65096
Summary: Apache POI Excel XLSX Streaming XML not correctly
reading multiple inline Strings
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Created attachment 37707
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37707&action=edit
Screenshot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
Created attachment 37708
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37708&action=edit
Sheet.xml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Created attachment 37709
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37709&action=edit
SampleApplication.java
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
Created attachment 37710
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37710&action=edit
Sample Output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #6 from Jack ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #5)
> This is probably a bug but do you have any idea what produced this xlsx
> file? The sheet1.xml is formatted and the namespace declarations are
> different from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
In short term, can you ask the owners of the proprietary software not to use
multiple elements for a cell?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #8 from PJ Fanning ---
The same bug exists in excel-streaming-reader - I have added a fix -
https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader/pull/29
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #9 from Jack ---
(In reply to PJ Fanning from comment #7)
> In short term, can you ask the owners of the proprietary software not to use
> multiple elements for a cell?
Unfortunately, as these files exist I need to be a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning ---
I've tried a fix - r1885770 - so far, it looks like the streaming xlsx parser
code is somewhat undertested - so I hope I haven't broken other use cases when
trying to fix this case
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64992
Bug 64992 depends on bug 64950, which changed state.
Bug 64950 Summary: about doughnutchart
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950
What|Removed |Added
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
Bug ID: 65099
Summary: NPE in XWPFStyle.getUsedStyleList(XWPFStyle style,
List usedStyleList)
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64411
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64256
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Stadler ---
The changelog is now updated with some more entries that were missing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65085
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Severity|normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65084
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65065
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||65058
--- Comment #2 from Dominik
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||65059
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Stadler ---
This is handled in https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/216 as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
Bug ID: 65101
Summary: Dependency Convergence issue with xml-apis on version
5.0.0
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63889
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
dsubel...@redwood.cl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Macintosh |All
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059
--- Comment #3 from gerard.du...@externe.bnpparibas.com ---
Yes.
The bug #65058 is about an error occuring with some parameter management. It
seems that this happens when a criteria range is starting at a different column
*and* row from the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
gerard.du...@externe.bnpparibas.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37687|0 |1
is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #3 from Yvan Lussaud ---
Yes I forgot the style initialization:
XWPFStyle style = document.getStyles().getStyle("TableauGrille41");
inputDoc.getStyles().getUsedStyleList(style);
This trigger the NPE with the linke
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
--- Comment #3 from gerard.du...@externe.bnpparibas.com ---
Created attachment 37714
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37714&action=edit
Excel version of the test case
Excel version of the test case
--
You are re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059
gerard.du...@externe.bnpparibas.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37689|0 |1
is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
--- Comment #2 from dsubel...@redwood.cl ---
Sure, that's the work around I implemented and got rid of the "maven-enforcer"
violation. The current pom.xml looks like this:
org.apache.poi
poi-ooxm
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
dsubel...@redwood.cl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
The issue is in the batik dependencies.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Subelman ---
You are right, should I report the issue there?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
probably best to start with https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BATIK
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101
Daniel Subelman changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://issues.apache.org/j
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
Bug ID: 65103
Summary: Java application cannot launch using JPMS and
POI-OOXML 5.0.0
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Stadler ---
This is fixed via r1886063 now, should be included in the upcoming Apache POI
5.0.1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64868
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
Also exact version of Java might be helpful to narrow down this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
codebangus...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #3 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #4 from codebangus...@gmail.com ---
The error message produced by running the NetBeans project is:
Error occurred during initialization of boot layer
java.lang.module.FindException: Unable to derive module descriptor for
/home
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Stadler ---
Ah, sorry, missed that part of the bug-report
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #6 from Dominik Stadler ---
Can you reproduce this also outside of NetBeans when run as standalone project?
As far as I know none of the active contributors of Apache POI uses NetBeans,
so would be good to be able to reproduce it
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
codebangus...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37716|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #8 from Dominik Stadler ---
Thanks, this makes it easier to reproduce it.
The following error message is actually reported with this now:
$ java -p target/modules -m
poiooxmljpmsbroken/com.codebangusllc.poiooxmljpmsbroken.Main
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Beeker ---
I can reproduce it on IntelliJ. I'm not sure why our junit-tests don't fail ...
yet.
Further reading:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54682417/java-11-unable-to-derive-module-descriptor
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63421
--- Comment #4 from David ---
data.setVaryColors(false) also works fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Bug ID: 65120
Summary: [PATCH] PartAlreadyExistsException when creating cell
comments
Product: POI
Version: 4.1.2-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #1 from Raúl Wegmann ---
Created attachment 37724
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37724&action=edit
patch including test
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Raúl Wegmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@wegmann.es
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63421
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
thanks - applied using r1886143 (the gradle change has since been reverted)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Beeker ---
Regarding "Provider class org.apache.batik.bridge.RhinoInterpreterFactory not
in module":
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1260
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65103
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Beeker ---
Created attachment 37725
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37725&action=edit
Fixed project
Fixed project attached
> mvn clean package
> java --module-path target/mod
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60924
Anthony V changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anthonyv...@outlook.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847
--- Comment #4 from Alain Fagot Bearez ---
I would suggest to close this issue as the effort to build some common code to
access charts from XSLF, XSSF and XWPF is now available as XDDF with its own
new set of related bugs.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65130
Bug ID: 65130
Summary: Line color of objects
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57835
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64165
John Claxton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37030|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64165
John Claxton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63902
--- Comment #3 from Johannes Paul ---
I am facing almost the same issue, except the fact, that i can't even open the
File anymore with Excel (2016).
It gets corrupted and can't be open, and not even be automatically repaired by
Exce
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63902
--- Comment #4 from Alain Fagot Bearez ---
Hi,
Could you repeat your experiment with the version I am trying to build on
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/227 and share your example file?
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57699
--- Comment #15 from PJ Fanning ---
There is some basic support in excel-streaming-reader, documented at
https://github.com/pjfanning/excel-streaming-reader#ooxml-strict-format
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63902
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Paul ---
Sadly i can't setup POI locally. It won't build.
If you provide me somehow the jars (or help me to setup POI), i would be happy
to test it!
gunter.henn...@gmx.de
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63902
--- Comment #6 from Alain Fagot Bearez ---
When successful, the build
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/POI/job/POI-DSL-1.16/195/ will contain
references to artifacts which you could download.
You can find guidance to setup your development
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63902
--- Comment #7 from Dominik Stadler ---
Related change: r1886605
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60072
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||59306
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||60072
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60072
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Stadler ---
Bug #59306 sounds similar or at least closely related.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59252
--- Comment #6 from Marcel M. ---
I just hit this bug in 5.0.0.
A (wasteful) workaround is to write to a NullOutputStream to trigger the in
place update of the File:
try (Workbook wb = WorkbookFactory.create(new File(&quo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046
mar...@volkhart.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046
--- Comment #5 from mar...@volkhart.com ---
Discussions on the mailing list
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdbddfbdfe492a266c1ee119a0cf08ae8211c3814e1ebc9b58bf7184f%40%3Cdev.poi.apache.org%3E
and
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Bug ID: 65153
Summary: Update logging documentation
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
this appears to be causing build problems in the java 16 build --
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/POI/job/POI-DSL-1.16 -- other builds seem to
be ok
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51037
--- Comment #13 from Ravi Kumar Bagdi ---
Has this bug been resolved as of today? Mine is a similar case where the data
filled in the column doesn't apply the style but the cells empty within that
column is showing style as expected.
P
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046
--- Comment #7 from mar...@volkhart.com ---
Thanks, fixed in 1886811
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60509
Bug 60509 depends on bug 54470, which changed state.
Bug 54470 Summary: [PATCH] Solution to support Graph in XSSFWorkbook.cloneSheet
method
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54470
What|Removed
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54470
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61474
Alain Fagot Bearez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #30 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57603
--- Comment #5 from mar...@volkhart.com ---
Created attachment 37753
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37753&action=edit
Patch demonstrating exception resolution
I believe the root cause to be that PAPBinTable#
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
ramaraju changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |enhancement
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015
--- Comment #20 from Saurabh ---
Hello Team,
We are trying to upgrade Apache POI 4.1.12.
As per https://github.com/brettwooldridge/SparseBitSet/blob/master/LICENSE, We
can see SparseBitSet 1.2 is license under Apache License 2.0.
However
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015
--- Comment #21 from PJ Fanning ---
Hi Saurabh,
That is not a question for Apache POI team - that is not our code. It is a
question for https://github.com/brettwooldridge/SparseBitSet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015
--- Comment #22 from Saurabh ---
Yes, thanks.
Can we configure/customize to use our own implementation and not SparseBitSet?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015
--- Comment #23 from PJ Fanning ---
Not everything in POI uses this code - so you could try excluding this lib and
see if your code still works.
You could also stick to an older version of POI - one released before we
introduced this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65165
Bug ID: 65165
Summary: [DateValue] DATEVALUE should throw an
EvaluationException
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65166
Bug ID: 65166
Summary: Apache Batik 1.13 vulnerabilities (CVE-2020-11987,
CVE-2020-11988)
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
101 - 200 of 25306 matches
Mail list logo
