https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #5 from Sayi ---
Possibly, but I am not very clear.
At least all of my word processing software can not reproduce this problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Bug ID: 65550
Summary: PPTX2PNG - SVGFormat - Incorrect rendering of some
rectangle shapes
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
--- Comment #1 from Max <0x00...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 38016
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38016&action=edit
A screenshot of the issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the ass
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Max <0x00...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38016|0 |1
is ob
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65551
Bug ID: 65551
Summary: Incorrect fetching paragraph and text runs props from
master shape
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63899
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
One option is to use this:
org.apache.poi.ooxml.POIXMLTypeLoader.DEFAULT_XML_OPTIONS.setLoadExternalDTD(false);
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63899
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
If you want to prevent the DTD being read at all, try this:
final String FEATURE_LOAD_DTD_GRAMMAR =
"http://apache.org/xml/features/nonvalidating/load-dtd-grammar";;
final String FEATURE_LOAD_EX
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
Bug ID: 65561
Summary: PPTX2PNG - Picture effects don't apply
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #1 from Max <0x00...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 38024
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38024&action=edit
A screenshot of the issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the ass
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65562
Bug ID: 65562
Summary: SXSSF doesn't update dimension field
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65562
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Could you provide some sample code to demo how to reproduce the issue?
This example creates a sheet with - possibly not ideal
but doesn't seem to cause any harm.
https://github.com/pjfanning/poi-s
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65551
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65520
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564
--- Comment #1 from Max <0x00...@gmail.com> ---
Created attachment 38026
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38026&action=edit
A screenshot of the issue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the ass
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564
Bug ID: 65564
Summary: PPTX2PNG - Charts aren't rendered
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564
Max <0x00...@gmail.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38026|0 |1
is ob
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60201
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||0x00...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65564
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
--- Comment #3 from gerard.du...@externe.bnpparibas.com ---
Created attachment 38028
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38028&action=edit
Bug fixes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks for the zip but the format is not what we normally accept.
The usual formats are: A svn patch file or (my preference) a github pull
request (https://github.com/apache/poi)
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65562
--- Comment #2 from handyme...@outlook.com ---
By "invalid" value, I am referring precisely to " "
I used the wrong word, it's not invalid but rather not "accurate".
What happens is that an applic
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572
Bug ID: 65572
Summary: Check for existing Sheet fails for names > 31
characters
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Sever
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65573
Bug ID: 65573
Summary: POI bin tgz on CI build is missing poi-ooxml-lite jar
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.x-dev
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65574
Bug ID: 65574
Summary: Update xlsx file when its is already created
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65574
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
POI is a volunteer project. If you don't like how the code works, you can
always submit a patch and the volunteers will look at it on its merits.
This does not sound like a bug to me but if you prov
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65574
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65574
--- Comment #2 from Alberto Gavazzi ---
Thanks for the reply
I am afraid you did not understand the severity of the bug because what I have
reported causes loss of information that may be important
Alberto
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65574
Alberto Gavazzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.gava...@iamboo.net
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65574
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Beeker ---
We have unit test to check if successive changes are saved to disc - just look
for the many invocations of "writeOutAndReadBack" in the test classes. So there
was someone who did a detailed an
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576
Bug ID: 65576
Summary: get approval for or replace for
StringCodepointsIterable
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.x-dev
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65573
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
change committed with r1893385
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Actually, I currently only have access to hosted Excel on Sharepoint and it
rigidly enforces a 31 char limit on worksheet names - so no, I don't think it
is a good idea to remove this in POI.
Maybe wh
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
the existing behaviour is clearly documented in the Javadocs.
```
* Note that Excel allows sheet names up to 31 chars in length but other
applications
* (such as OpenOffice) allow more. Some
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
Also this:
```
* See {@link WorkbookUtil#createSafeSheetName(String nameProposal)}
* for a safe way to create valid names
```
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581
Bug ID: 65581
Summary: add optional support in ZipArchiveFakeEntry to use a
temp file
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.x-dev
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |All
Hardware|PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
IOException("ZIP entry size is too large or invalid") is the existing exception
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
added implementation using r1893421
Using this will mean all zip entries with greater than 50Mb decompressed data
will be put in a temp file instead of kept in memory
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
ZipInputStreamZipEntrySource.setEncryptTempFiles(true); //also now supported
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65595
Bug ID: 65595
Summary: [PATCH] Strip colour formatting in headers and footers
created by Excel
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.x-dev
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65595
--- Comment #1 from Viru ---
Created attachment 38047
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38047&action=edit
Patch
This patch is a gzipped tar containing the subversion diff and a test file used
for the unit test
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65595
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Thanks - committed with r1893599
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64716
--- Comment #16 from liming-coder <652611...@qq.com> ---
Created attachment 38048
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38048&action=edit
the image rendered too small
the image in 16.zip is rendered too small. p
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64716
liming-coder <652611...@qq.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38048|the image rendered too |
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57184
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
see https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/254
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65606
Bug ID: 65606
Summary: Bug in evaluationg WEEKNUM
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65606
Axel Richter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bug in evaluationg WEEKNUM |Bug in evaluating WEEKNUM
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
--- Comment #6 from gerard.du...@externe.bnpparibas.com ---
Sorry for the blunt zip archive. This was intented to be "sorted" by myself
(into one or two more bugs, and a real fix for the current bug), but I did not
found yet some tim
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
--- Comment #7 from gerard.du...@externe.bnpparibas.com ---
Sorry for the blunt zip archive. This was intented to be "sorted" by myself
(into one or two more bugs, and a real fix for the current bug), but I did not
found yet some tim
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
--- Comment #8 from PJ Fanning ---
thanks - it would be nice to have smaller patch submissions - because they are
easier to apply
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
--- Comment #9 from PJ Fanning ---
Gerard - I put the values from original comment (with attachment 37804) on this
issue into Numbers (a Mac equivalent of Excel) and the result of
SUMPRODUCT(COUNTIF(B1:B3, C1:C3)) was 2 not 5
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609
Bug ID: 65609
Summary: Flush not working
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: XSSF
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
Instead of changing SXSSFSheet.flushRow(), I've added a new method -
SXSSFSheet.flushBufferedData(). This is so that not everyone is affected by a
behaviour change, users can choose to call flushBuffere
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609
--- Comment #3 from David Juarez ---
Thank you very much for your change. When do you think that the version
containing the new feature would be released (at least as beta)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
The next release is delayed by other incomplete work. You could try
DeferredSXSSFWorkbook like I suggested before. There are also CI builds - eg
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/POI/job/POI-DSL-1.8/ (which
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65609
--- Comment #5 from PJ Fanning ---
main change is r1893791
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65606
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
I've added a few commits to try to improve things - main one is r1893852
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65595
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
Severity|critical
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612
Bug ID: 65612
Summary: XSLF CustomGeometry - replace XmlStreamReader access
with XmlBeans delegate
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.x-dev
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
Bug ID: 65613
Summary: DeferredSXSSFWorkbook still using temp files
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
Patric Rufflar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pat...@rufflar.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
It was not the intention to 100% avoid temp files but to create fewer temp
files.
Also note that the code is still regarded as experimental.
If you don't want any temp files, then maybe you can sub
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #2 from Patric Rufflar ---
We are facing the same issue.
In some environments, e.g. for application server scenarios, any usage of the
file system might be prohibited. In these cases, POI / SXSSF can't be used.
A tempfile
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
the deferred sxssf code is not widely used and is not well tested - it is not
core code and was submitted with minimal test coverage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
One alternative is https://github.com/dhatim/fastexcel which may support excel
generation without the use of temp files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #5 from Patric Rufflar ---
Yes, fastexcel completely avoids temporary files.
Unfortunately, fastexcel also lacks important features (which POI offers).
Is there a roadmap / release target for having this feature production-ready
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
POI has no roadmap - it is a mature project with a small volunteer base -
essentially, if you want a feature, you write it yourself - other developers
might take an interest and review your ideas and/or code
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
I've added r1893896 - try it out if you like - I'm in 2 minds as to whether to
leave this code in for the release - I'm not sure it is a good approach and I
don't have much time to do mu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65613
--- Comment #8 from Patric Rufflar ---
Thanks, I'll have a look!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
Bug ID: 65619
Summary: with POI upgrade to 5.0.0, we see that it formats
dates with extra slash
Product: POI
Version: 5.0.0-FINAL
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #2 from hethal ---
here is the code that we are using in our app
return new DataFormatter() {
@Override
public String formatRawCellContents (double value, int
formatIndex, String formatString
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #3 from hethal ---
you can take a look at the below code:
dateFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd MMM HH:mm:ss");
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
I can't reproduce any issue - I put a test case at
https://github.com/pjfanning/poi-gradle-example/tree/bug-65619 (NB a branch of
this project called bug-65619).
The code in this branch gives the same r
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #5 from hethal ---
Please take a look at the below code that we are using for our app:
public Builder dataFormat (String format)
{
return new Builder(fontTransform, cellStyleTransform.andThen(
(cs, ch) -> cs.setDataFor
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
hethal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
This is not a reproducible use case - maybe someone else will have a look but I
don't have time to look at this without a reproducible use case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the ass
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
the code in last comment is not POI code - you probably need someone in your
company to use a Java debugger to debug the code
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #8 from hethal ---
Created attachment 38059
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38059&action=edit
spreadsheet compare file with date format mismatch between 4.1.2 and 5.0.0.
Showing that there are back
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #9 from hethal ---
Below here is the code that we tried on POI 5.0.0 and POI 4.1.2 as well and
were able to reproduce that the POI 5.0.0 added the extra slashes as attache d
in the jpg image.
Code:
import java.io.FileOutputStream
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #10 from PJ Fanning ---
I ran the sample code and my output was fine (no slashes) - I have this in the
styles.xml -
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #11 from PJ Fanning ---
I added this passing regression test - r1894016
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65606
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
OS|Windows NT
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49202
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65490
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65065
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
601 - 700 of 25314 matches
Mail list logo
