Hi,
the 2nd run of the regression tests is now finished, results look much
better now, only very few failures left (56 failures in 12 stacktraces):
1) o.a.p.ooxml.POIXMLException: error: The document is not a
xml@urn:schemas-poi-apache-org:vmldrawing:
document element namespace mismatch expected
Hi,
Thanks for the fixes and the "stress" documents, I added a few more and
added a test for the normal unit-tests to trigger those documents,
otherwise the ooxml-schema-lite does not contain them as far as I saw.
Next regression-run is underway...
Dominik.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 8:25 PM Andre
HI,
I've mentioned it in our private slack group *) - there's also an ant error,
which ignores quite a few *$Factory.class-es in packing the lite jar.
I'm currently trying to figure out how I can workaround this.
Another potential approach: ...
This was my first approach class -> xsb, but it
Hi,
I'd go for b), hopefully not too many are necessary, it seems a simple test
which reads in the document triggers the necesary parts in most of the
cases.
c) would mean anybody out there with such a file would now get
regression-errors unless he switches to the full file.
Another potential ap
Hi Dominik,
thank you for running the regression test.
* Most of these are because the "lite" ooxml-schema jar is still missing
some stuff, not sure if the new way of building the lite-jar is the cause
or if we now use more parts in the regression tests
The lite jar used to contain all *.xsb
Hi,
In order to get the release-preparations rolling a bit, I have finished a
first run of the "mass regression test" exercise.
As usual it brings up cases where documents fail now, but did work fine
previously, i.e. regressions that we may have introduced since the previous
release.
I now proce
