> How about we adopt a full lazy-evaluation approach for Formula objects?
I opened bug 61136 [1] and took a stab at full lazy evaluation [2].
Travis, would you be willing to test the memory consumption and
execution speed with these changes in HSSF and XSSF relative to trunk
and your patch (8ab388
How about we adopt a full lazy-evaluation approach for Formula objects?
Either _byteEncoding and _encodedTokenLen should be provided or
_ptgTokens should be provided. Only when the other is needed should
Ptg.readTokens or Ptg.serializeTokens be called.
As I understand it, reading and serializing t
formulas, and it takes ~21
minutes to evaluate. If I apply these 2 patches to disable double
formula validation:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033
The same thing executes in 11 minutes.
In the interest of completeness, I tried SXSSF with a -1 row limit but
killed it at the ~50
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59826
Javen O'Neal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59826
Bug ID: 59826
Summary: Apply ant-generated patch.tar.gz patches
Product: POI
Version: 3.15-dev
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
repo, push the changes to
your fork, then open a pull request
Otherwise, something like this should give you all the patches pending:
git diff --stat --cached origin/master
And this for the diffs:
git diff --cached origin/master
I have a small change to xwpf that I am working on in a local Git repository,
but I need to know how to create a patch. The documentation on the How to
contribute page isn't particularly helpful.
the manual way
> Approach 3 - the git way
> """
>
> What is the current preference among the POI committers and community?
I usually check things in and apologise for them afterwards ;)
Seriously, though, I tend to use Eclipse to generate patches, though it
does share
the manual way
> Approach 3 - the git way
> """
>
> What is the current preference among the POI committers and community?
I usually check things in and apologise for them afterwards ;)
Seriously, though, I tend to use Eclipse to generate patches, though it
does share
.
In the event of a git pull request, we get an email sent to the list with
a summary of the request and a link. Going to the link shows you all about
it and allows a graphical review, going to .patch (append ".patch"
to the URL) gets you the raw git patches to r
> What is the current preference among the POI committers and community?
Receiving a patch:
I haven't checked how to receive the git pull requests as I'm not having a
local POI git repository -
so this is currently my least preferred format.
Apart of that, I don't care if approach 1 or 2 is used
>From http://poi.apache.org/guidelines.html#SubmittingPatches
"""
You may create your patch file using either of the following
approaches (the committers recommend the first):
Approach 1 - use Ant
Approach 2 - the manual way
Approach 3 - the git way
"""
What is the current preference among the POI
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
Andreas Beeker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
Hi,
Thanks Andi for this huge piece of work, I think we are nearly there
now, seems the Calendar-to-Date stuff in DateUtil still messes this up
at some point :(
I narrowed it down a bit, the following works with "CET" for me (my
local timezone), but fails with "UTC", so there is something flaky
h
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Beeker ---
The charset fixes are applied with r1701713
So it looks like, there's only - a probably not so easy to catch - error with
CellDateFormatter to fix ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Beeker ---
first set of changes for locale and timezone settings with r1701688
also includes fixes for
- name shadowing
- unused deprecated method "getClipRect" in classes extending Graphics2d
- HexDump - replaced i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Stadler ---
I like the separate LocaleUtil class which encapsulates the selection of all
these items,
I think it would be good to apply these changes now without enabling more
forbidden-api-checks in order to get t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
Bug ID: 58326
Summary: Forbidden APIs patches
Product: POI
Version: 3.13-dev
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: PatchAvailable
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Beeker ---
Created attachment 33060
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33060&action=edit
[PATCH] patch for forbidden apis - v1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
Hi,
We have a few patches which we're hoping to tidy up and get accepted
over the next couple of months.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56705 - any further
thoughts on this, in particular, response to our last comment?
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55410
Hi Nick,
is there actually any difference between releasing the final vs. another beta?
e.g. an extended testsuite? crosschecks with tika?
Not sure, if this makes sense, but I think fixing the BiffViewer or its test
cases would be a nice
feature for a final milestone.
Andi
--
Hi All
It's now almost 2 months since our last beta release. What do people think
about the next release? Do we roll another beta, to get feedback? Or do we
all make a big push to get the outstanding patches applied (of which there
are still a lot...), then go for 3.10 final in a few
First of all, thank you for your patches and interest in the POI project.
Your contributions are appreciated !
Please always change status from NEEDINFO to NEW when you upload patches to
existing / old bugs. I have a bookmark that returns all open POI bugs and
it does not include NEEDINFO:
https
ng
with your patch applied!
Also, try to avoid fixing whitespace at teh same time as fixing/adding
logic. We do have somewhat of a whitespace mess in places, as we only
recently finally agreed on a standard... Generally best to do 2 patches if
needed, one with whitesapce only, and one with logic
ty
and see what could be done - apart of that, is there bug-wishlist?
If your time permits, please have a look at my open patches -
I'm looking forward to your feedback ;)
(ordered by (my guessed) severity ...)
- [PATCH] Multiple Saves Causes Slide Corruption
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/s
Hi Yegor,
I have updated patch with drawing utility.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53058
Thanks
With best regards, Evgeniy Berlog
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional comm
, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
> Hello Evgeniy, Adel, Lakshani , GSoC applicants
>
> To make the GSoC selection process more accurate I encourage you to
> make a next step after submission. Please provide working patches or
> code that will advance your proposal.
>
> We have to estimate
ts
>>
>> To make the GSoC selection process more accurate I encourage you to
>> make a next step after submission. Please provide working patches or
>> code that will advance your proposal.
>>
>> We have to estimate coding skills of each participant, not only
Berlog
10.04.2012 14:20, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
Hello Evgeniy, Adel, Lakshani , GSoC applicants
To make the GSoC selection process more accurate I encourage you to
make a next step after submission. Please provide working patches or
code that will advance your proposal.
We have to estimate coding
Hello Evgeniy, Adel, Lakshani , GSoC applicants
To make the GSoC selection process more accurate I encourage you to
make a next step after submission. Please provide working patches or
code that will advance your proposal.
We have to estimate coding skills of each participant, not only
proposal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607
--- Comment #4 from Aniket 2011-01-19 08:51:36 EST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> *** Bug 50384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Thanks Yegor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=ema
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607
--- Comment #3 from Yegor Kozlov 2011-01-19 07:32:08 EST ---
*** Bug 50384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607
Yegor Kozlov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607
Aniket changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||All
--- Comment #1 from Aniket 2011-01-1
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607
Aniket changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||Windows 7
--
Configure bugmail: https://
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607
Summary: Submitting patches for two new function
implementations(CLEAN and ADDRESS).
Product: POI
Version: 3.8-dev
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
Severity
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21325
Yegor Kozlov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
38 matches
Mail list logo
