https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are receivin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Stadler ---
They are public static methods which you can call whenever you use Apache POI
in your code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Comment #4 from Rakhi Barayanan ---
Hi Dominik,
Thanks for the update.I hope Even ZipSecureFile.setMaxEntrySize() and
ZipSecureFile.setMinInflateRatio() should be set from the poi code,not from the
api we are consuming.Could you please le
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Stadler ---
The error message tries to state how you can ignore this in your code if you
are sure the file is not malicious.
Please try the suggestion from the error-message and report back if that does
not work fo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Comment #2 from Rakhi Barayanan ---
Hi Fanning,
Thanks for your quick response.This work around is in poi code.We are not doing
customization in poi code.Is there a way to resolve this outside of poi code.
--
You are receiving this mail
|NEEDINFO
Severity|critical|normal
Hardware|PC |All
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Is this what you are talking about?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44897500/using-apache-poi-zip-bomb-detected
The
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Rakhi Barayanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |Windows Server 2012 R2
--
You are r
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Rakhi Barayanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
Severity|normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Bug ID: 69705
Summary: ZIP BOMB DETECTED WHILE WORKING WITH apache poi 5.0.0
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|PC |All
OS|Mac OS X 10.1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
--- Comment #4 from PJ Fanning ---
I have no plan to backport this to an old version of POI but I have made
changes in trunk to revert part of the HSLF change in 4.0.0.
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
most likely this commit is the issue - but again it changes a lot of code
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/f395630abd891b9d4ee09932c309d566d8360860
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
I have isolated the breaking change to April 2018 among these commits.
https://github.com/apache/poi/commits/REL_4_0_0_FINAL/src/scratchpad/src/org/apache/poi/hslf
There are a couple of large changes then so
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
I have reproduced this. The ppt is created but Microsoft Powerpoint won't open
it.
I can't yet see what has changed the HSLF code in POI but on first appraisal,
not a lot has changed. HSLF is not a very active
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are receivin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
parvathyskumar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||parvathyskumar...@gmail.co
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669
Bug ID: 69669
Summary: ppt created using Apache POI is corrupted when using
addTitle()
Product: POI
Version: 5.4.1-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 5.4.1.
This is primarily a bug fix release.
See the downloads page for source distributions:
https://poi.apache.org/download.html
Release Notes
Changes
A full list of changes is available in the change log:
https
Hi everyone,
The vote passes with 4 +1s, all binding and no other votes.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/1hpn478oh8btr53yxnggv3rlo9cdyl37
Votes (Apache IDs)
axh
tallison
centic
fanningpj
I will proceed with the release. Thanks to everyone who participated
in the development and revie
, Apr 1, 2025 at 11:25 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.1 (RC1).
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/7qv51c012fqsy39o1r5ft3jxpf10bn1r
>
> The release candidate:
> https:/
h these jars, please also
> notify us on this thread.
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/poi/
>
> In gradle, you can add this repository.
>
> maven {
> url "https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/";
> }
>
>
Just did a small test and looks good.
+1
> Am 01.04.2025 um 23:25 schrieb PJ Fanning :
>
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.1 (RC1).
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/7qv51c012fqsy39o1
Hello POI Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.1 (RC1).
The discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/7qv51c012fqsy39o1r5ft3jxpf10bn1r
The release candidate:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/5.4.1-RC1/
This release has been signed with a PGP
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status|NE
|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Burch ---
Apache POI has methods to check if a cell is blank or empty or missing, via the
missing cell policy.
If Microsoft are suggesting that in some situations, you should check for
blank/empty/missing cells, and instead replace
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are receivin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
--- Comment #2 from Rakhi Barayanan ---
Can someone check on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
; From: Wood, Wayne (WP)
> Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 4:17 PM
> Subject: Apache POI issue
> To: apa...@apache.org
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are currently having an issue that is just like this one with our EPPlus
> DLL library: Bad Signature BadReadException On Valid Ex
Forwarded from apa...@apache.org. Please respond, if desired, to
original sender, not me.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Wood, Wayne (WP)
Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Subject: Apache POI issue
To: apa...@apache.org
Hi,
We are currently having an issue that is just like
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
--- Comment #2 from Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado ---
We can reproduce with the same tools of #69557 but the issue is different as
for this case we know the size of the entry but the entry is always bigger than
any buffer we can choose.
If I take t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are receivin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
OS|Mac OS X 10.1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
--- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning ---
Please provide a new case to reproduce this. If it is the same as 69557, please
close this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
Bug ID: 69558
Summary: Selecting appropriate file we can make Apache POI to
crash
Product: POI
Version: 5.2.3-FINAL
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 5.4.0.
This is primarily a bug fix release.
See the downloads page for source distributions:
https://poi.apache.org/download.html
Release Notes
Changes
A full list of changes is available in the change log:
https
The vote passes with 3 +1s, all from POI PMC members. There were no other votes.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/q54l5s1dm31f9s75qdpzncfhbr5mvy6x
Votes (Apache IDs)
centic
tallison
fanningpj
I will proceed with the release. Thanks to everyone who participated
in the development and r
> [ERROR] and
> > > [ERROR]
> +-org.apache.tika:tika-parser-microsoft-module:jar:4.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > [ERROR] +-org.apache.poi:poi-ooxml:jar:5.4.0:compile
> > > [ERROR] +-org.apache.xmlbeans:xmlbeans:jar:5.3.0:compile
> > > [ERROR
gt; > [ERROR] +-org.apache.xmlbeans:xmlbeans:jar:5.3.0:compile
> > [ERROR] +-org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api:jar:3.9.9:runtime
> > [ERROR] +-org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-classworlds:jar:2.8.0:runtime
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 a
we can
> > proceed. If anyone has time, it would be much appreciated.
> >
> >
> > On 2025/01/02 13:29:43 Dominik Stadler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tested the staged binaries with various projects and reviewed contents
> > of
> > &g
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69529
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are receivin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69529
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning ---
It does look like the code could be a bit more robust.
I've added r1922985 and r1922986.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69529
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
OS|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69529
Bug ID: 69529
Summary: XLSX File failed when parsed using apache poi 5.2.5
version which has OOXML extractor parser but the same
file in version 5.2.3 its successfully parsed
tribution. Also compilation from source did work. So
> > everything fine as far as I see.
> >
> > I vote +1 for release!
> >
> > Thanks PJ for preparing the release! Dominik.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 8:19 PM PJ Fanning
> > wrote:
> >
bution. Also compilation from source did work. So
> everything fine as far as I see.
>
> I vote +1 for release!
>
> Thanks PJ for preparing the release! Dominik.
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 8:19 PM PJ Fanning
> wrote:
>
> > Hello POI Community,
> >
> >
wrote:
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC2).
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/4sd7p5z2cxp0l9wb2orw4n0gc9w348gw
>
> The release candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/5.
Hello POI Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC2).
The discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/4sd7p5z2cxp0l9wb2orw4n0gc9w348gw
The release candidate:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/5.4.0-RC2/
This release has been signed with a
rote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Just had time to try the RC out. +1.
>
>
> > Am 08.11.2024 um 20:04 schrieb PJ Fanning :
> >
> > Hello POI Community,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC1).
> >
> > The discussio
Am 08.11.2024 um 20:04 schrieb PJ Fanning :
>
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC1).
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/fjxgn9rjo5x8ho9ssnow32mrrrotlhgj
>
> The release candidate:
> https://d
Just had time to try the RC out. +1.
> Am 08.11.2024 um 20:04 schrieb PJ Fanning :
>
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC1).
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/fjxgn9rjo5x8ho9ssnow32mrr
t;>>>> Log4j, the static getLogger() returns null when using POI 5.4.0 and
>>> Log4j
>>>>> 2.24.0 in a sample project.
>>>>>
>>>>> When updating Log4j to 2.24.1, it works again.
>>>>>
>>>>> So sounds like
t.
>>>>>
>>>>> When updating Log4j to 2.24.1, it works again.
>>>>>
>>>>> So sounds like a regression in Log4j 2.24.1 when combined with 2.24.0,
>>>>> which would be strange.
>>>>>
>>
t; > > > So sounds like a regression in Log4j 2.24.1 when combined with 2.24.0,
> > > > which would be strange.
> > > >
> > > > This reproduces with a very simple project, e.g. running "./gradlew
> > > > runWriteFile -PpoiVersion=
4.0,
> > > which would be strange.
> > >
> > > This reproduces with a very simple project, e.g. running "./gradlew
> > > runWriteFile -PpoiVersion=5.4.0" in a checkout of
> > > https://github.com/centic9/poi-reproduce
> > >
> > &
be strange.
> >
> > This reproduces with a very simple project, e.g. running "./gradlew
> > runWriteFile -PpoiVersion=5.4.0" in a checkout of
> > https://github.com/centic9/poi-reproduce
> >
> > Would be interesting if others see the same!
> >
> &
PJ Fanning
> wrote:
>
>> Hello POI Community,
>>
>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC1).
>>
>> The discussion thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/fjxgn9rjo5x8ho9ssnow32mrrrotlhgj
>>
>> The release candidat
PJ Fanning
wrote:
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC1).
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/fjxgn9rjo5x8ho9ssnow32mrrrotlhgj
>
> The release candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/
Hello POI Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.4.0 (RC1).
The discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/fjxgn9rjo5x8ho9ssnow32mrrrotlhgj
The release candidate:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/5.4.0-RC1/
This release has been signed with a
|RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Dominik Stadler ---
A simple check now did not show any differences any more when building latest
Apache POI twice.
There are also some unit-tests which verify that written files do not differ if
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set.
See https
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|POI Overall |SS Common
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267
Bug ID: 69267
Summary: Inconsistent Behavior in Grouping and Ungrouping
Columns in Apache POI
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X
Hi Muhammad,
What exactly does "acquiring" mean? I don't think that closing the source
code or changing the licence will work.
Apache POI welcomes any type of contribution / collaboration as long as it
remains an ASF project. The Openize team is welcome to contribute in any
form
etc.).
* Modify: Ability to edit and manipulate the content and structure of
documents, spreadsheets, and presentations.
* Convert: Convert between different office file formats.
We believe that integrating Apache POI
[https://openize.dripize.com/r/b58c11f07c49
The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 5.3.0.
This is primarily a bug fix release.
See the downloads page for source distributions:
https://poi.apache.org/download.html
Release Notes
Changes
A full list of changes is available in the change log:
https
The vote passes with 3 +1s, all binding. There were no other votes.
Vote Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/5g2c02csg66myl021km0t1gyfo3rw205
Some issue with PonyMail doesn't make the 3rd vote obvious.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/dfxco3jfhfc7xy1l4s849s49fllmhm94
Votes:
Dominik Stadler
M
gt;
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:33 PM PJ Fanning
> wrote:
>
>> Hello POI Community,
>>
>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.3.0 (RC1).
>>
>> The discussion thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/nd9zzz48gn4vpngpnc2ccxj8x
Hi,
Any of the comitters, please spend a few minutes and take a look to not
make the vote fail due to too less responses!
Regards... Dominik.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:33 PM PJ Fanning
wrote:
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.3.0 (RC1).
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/nd9zzz48gn4vpngpnc2ccxj8xvog6mvx
>
> The release candidate:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/5.3.0-RC1/
>
>
> This release has
Hello POI Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.3.0 (RC1).
The discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/nd9zzz48gn4vpngpnc2ccxj8xvog6mvx
The release candidate:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/5.3.0-RC1/
This release has been signed with a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
--- Comment #9 from J English ---
Your recommended solution worked! Thanks again for all your help guys
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
--- Comment #8 from J English ---
Yes, the reason is that we import data from a csv file, which stores the data
as comma-delimited String values; thus, when we import the data, all values are
imported as a Strings and I use POI to populate the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
--- Comment #7 from sfis...@gmail.com ---
honestly, the real solution is coerce the values going into the cells to
double, that way the underlying framework does not change the cell type to
string.
from reading the javadoc of the various setCel
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
--- Comment #6 from J English ---
PJ, my bad I forgot to answer your original question. Yes, I did try
re-ordering the code by setting the cell type after the cell value, but it
displayed the following data in the excel file, which seemed prett
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INFORMATIONPROVIDED
Status|NE
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
--- Comment #4 from J English ---
Thank you both for your inputs.
Yes, there are no formulas included the code because I have a customer that
wants to add their own custom formulas to the spreadsheet after the file has
generated.
Also, the is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
*** Bug 68974 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
T
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
--- Comment #2 from Nick Burch ---
I can't see any formula setting in your code
If you set a formula with POI and we don't evaluate it properly, that's our bug
(or possibly one of our limitations)
If you open a file in Excel, it looks fine, b
985
> Summary: Unable to edit cell type on excel file that was
> generated via Apache Poi API (edit)
> Product: POI
> Version: unspecified
> Hardware: PC
>Status: NEW
> Severity: norm
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985
Bug ID: 68985
Summary: Unable to edit cell type on excel file that was
generated via Apache Poi API (edit)
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
--- Comment #8 from J English ---
Created attachment 39698
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39698&action=edit
zip file contains a simple test class and an excel template
Hi PJ,
Hopefully this is a lot simpler than the pr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
--- Comment #7 from J English ---
OK got it. No worries. I'll try uploading much simpler version of the code.
I'll keep you posted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
--- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning ---
I am not going to look any further at that sample. It is far too complicated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
--- Comment #5 from J English ---
Sorry, please use this version of the test class. This version has the correct
file names for the csv file, excel template file, and output file.
Thank you
import java.io.File;
public class TestExcelWrite
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
--- Comment #4 from J English ---
Created attachment 39697
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39697&action=edit
zip file that contains class, test class, csv file, excel template, and output
files
Thank you for your help. I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
Yulianan87 changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://202.72.220.154/andro
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
--- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning ---
If you want Excel to calculate the formulas when you open the workbook, you
need to call.
workbook.setForceFormulaRecalculation(true);
POI has some basic support for calculating formula results but a lot of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
PJ Fanning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning
am current using the 4.1.2 version of Apache POI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68974
Bug ID: 68974
Summary: Unable to edit cell type on excel file that was
generated via Apache Poi API
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
Rakhi Barayanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
OS|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
Bug ID: 68526
Summary: Do we have any Apache POI documentation for
spreadsheet accessibility
Product: POI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 5.2.5.
This is primarily a bug fix release.
See the downloads page for source distributions:
https://poi.apache.org/download.html
Release Notes
Changes
A full list of changes is available in the change log:
https
The vote carries with 3 +1s, all binding.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/k2lx3cjz5p3txkl5o7yl5b39ss491zc3
Votes
Tim Allison
Dominik Stadler
PJ Fanning
I will proceed with a release and send the announcement emails over
the coming days.
--
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Reddy, Sri Rama wrote:
I've recently encountered an issue with SUMPRODUCT advanced use cases in
Apache POI
What specifically didn't work?
Detailed steps to reproduce the problem, and/or a failing junit unit test
showing the issue, would be most helpful
as o
Hi POI Team,
I've recently encountered an issue with SUMPRODUCT advanced use cases in Apache
POI, as outlined in the official GitHub documentation. Currently, these use
cases are not supported, resulting in formula evaluation errors in Excel files
that rely on SUMPRODUCT.
I'm reach
x524RC1to525RC1.html
> for details
>
> So I am +1 for Apache POI 5.2.5
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 12:37 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> > Hello POI Community,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.2.5 (RC1).
> >
&g
1 for Apache POI 5.2.5
Thanks!
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 12:37 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hello POI Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache POI version 5.2.5 (RC1).
>
> The discussion thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/v34mgjl4tm5b0s76b7cbj3xxb7lp2sv7
1 - 100 of 1059 matches
Mail list logo
