https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
dsti...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.2.2-FINAL |5.4.1-FINAL
--- Comment #14 from ds
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #13 from Arthur ---
Yes I'm using POI 5.2.5 for these artifacts:
* poi
* poi-ooxml
* poi-ooxml-lite
* poi-scratchpad
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #12 from PJ Fanning ---
Are you using POI 5.2.5? The change that was made is only in the most recent
version(s).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
Arthur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #10 from markuswue...@hotmail.com ---
Hi
Thanks for your reply. You're right, the change is included.
What i don't understand is, if i need to call
workbook#createInformationProperties() after object creation so that it is
fully ini
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #9 from PJ Fanning ---
The commit is in the code - see
https://github.com/apache/poi/commits/8690df1d28991ad482fa39181fd2a81fa2163301/poi/src/main/java/org/apache/poi/POIDocument.java
Is it possible the commit does not work?
--
Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #8 from willy.gwer...@emineo.ch ---
There have been two releases since this issue had been fixed. However, it was
not included in either release.
Any chance this will make it to the next release? Thanks!
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
nicolas.her...@emineo.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #7 from PJ Fanning ---
I added r1905045 - thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #6 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
NB. I didn't override readPropertySet(Class, String) because its private and
only used twice.
I think it would be rather difficult to write a test (static mocking of
logger...) The only test I co
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #5 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
Created attachment 38432
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38432&action=edit
Proposed patch
Proposed patch to not warn about missing property sets the first time (when
they a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #4 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
Thank you for your quick response!
I'll give it a try tomorrow if I get on with the whole project setup...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #3 from Nick Burch ---
Create shouldn't issue warnings about missing bits, that does seem like a bug
I guess we should override readProperties and readPropertySet with a boolean
for "being null is fine", which the createInformation
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #2 from nicolas.her...@emineo.ch ---
Hi Nick!
Thanks for the explanation!
I'm actually not using HSSFWorkbook#getBytes() directly, but using
HSSFWorkbook#write(OutputStream).
Unfortunately, if I use PoiDocument#createInformationProi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #1 from Nick Burch ---
If you're creating a file from scratch, you may want to have the normal
document properties setup. POIDocument.html#createInformationProperties-- will
do that for you
Also, calling HSSFWorkbook.getBytes() isn
15 matches
Mail list logo