Build failed in Jenkins: POI » POI-DSL-Windows-1.16 #303

See Changes: [Andreas Beeker] sonar fixes [PJ Fanning] comments [PJ Fanning] [bug-65644] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats. Thanks to Adam DeSapio [PJ Fanning] [bug-64258] support TDIS

Build failed in Jenkins: POI » POI-DSL-1.17 #51

See Changes: [Andreas Beeker] sonar fixes [PJ Fanning] comments [PJ Fanning] [bug-65644] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats. Thanks to Adam DeSapio [PJ Fanning] [bug-64258] support TDIST functio

[Bug 65644] [PATCH] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 65644] [PATCH] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 --- Comment #3 from PJ Fanning --- I think I sorted out the merge issues manually. Applied r1894386 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65644] [PATCH] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 --- Comment #2 from Adam DeSapio --- My apologies, I referenced http://poi.apache.org/devel/guidelines.html#SubmittingPatches for the right way to do things and must have missed that. I was looking into solving a problem in the version I used a

[Bug 65644] [PATCH] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- W

[Bug 65644] [PATCH] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 Adam DeSapio changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38074|Patch file for |Patch file for description|CellF

[Bug 65644] New: [PATCH] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65644 Bug ID: 65644 Summary: [PATCH] Improved regex for Excel accounting formats Product: POI Version: 4.1.2-FINAL Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: major Priority

[Bug 65640] org.apache.poi.ooxml.POIXMLException on parsing docx file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65640 --- Comment #3 from Tim Allison --- This was initially opened on Tika's JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3578). We had another user earlier report the same thing: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2404 I agree that th

[Bug 65640] org.apache.poi.ooxml.POIXMLException on parsing docx file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65640 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI » POI-DSL-1.11 #134

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?

Apologies for being absent... The xsb issue is why we haven't upgraded to 5.x on Tika yet. I _think_ we'd like to avoid the ooxml-full jar, but if that's the most robust option, we'll have to go with that. I'm also happy to grab new files, or run against our corpus if that'd be of any use. Many

TDIST.RT function

Hi, I implemented TDIST.RT function today. I ran into 1 issue. Online docs seems to indicate that negative X is ok (docs do not explicitly say it is a problem) while it isn't for TDIST and TDIST.2T (docs explicitly say it is a problem) https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/t-dist-rt-funct

[Bug 65643] FILTER function wrong number of arguments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65643 --- Comment #2 from PJ Fanning --- https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/616cdf944be2df447aaabd091dbbbff492472880 is a good example of how to add support for a missing function -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for t

[Bug 65643] FILTER function wrong number of arguments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65643 --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- I don't think POI implements FILTER at all. Not every function is supported. If you would like to implement it yourself, that would be great. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

Re: POI 5.1.0 RC2?

Hi, You are right, we discussed the reasons before, I am sorry. LG... Dominik. On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:06 PM Andreas Beeker wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > > Would be nice to know what changes made them required now as the > documents themselves did not change. > > I think you know, but to be safe,

[Bug 65643] FILTER function wrong number of arguments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65643 Raul Martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raul.mar...@urjc.es -- You are receivin

[Bug 65643] New: FILTER function wrong number of arguments

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65643 Bug ID: 65643 Summary: FILTER function wrong number of arguments Product: POI Version: 5.0.0-FINAL Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1 Status: NEW Severity:

Build failed in Jenkins: POI » POI-DSL-1.11 #133

See Changes: [PJ Fanning] warning about varargs [PJ Fanning] [bug-64258] support TDIST function [PJ Fanning] scaling issue -- [...truncated 35.12 KB...] found:

[Bug 65640] org.apache.poi.ooxml.POIXMLException on parsing docx file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65640 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- I

[Bug 65639] org.apache.poi.util.RecordFormatException: Tried to allocate an array of length 4276190, but 1000000 is the maximum for this record type

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65639 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 65639] org.apache.poi.util.RecordFormatException: Tried to allocate an array of length 4276190, but 1000000 is the maximum for this record type

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65639 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- I

[Bug 65640] New: org.apache.poi.ooxml.POIXMLException on parsing docx file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65640 Bug ID: 65640 Summary: org.apache.poi.ooxml.POIXMLException on parsing docx file Product: POI Version: 4.1.2-FINAL Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity

[Bug 65639] New: org.apache.poi.util.RecordFormatException: Tried to allocate an array of length 4276190, but 1000000 is the maximum for this record type

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65639 Bug ID: 65639 Summary: org.apache.poi.util.RecordFormatException: Tried to allocate an array of length 4276190, but 100 is the maximum for this record type Product: PO

[Bug 64258] Provide implementation for TDIST function

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64258 --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- added r1894378 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apac

Re: Inquiries about apache poi 4.x maintenance

Hi, We would not usually upgrade POI 4. POI 5 is the maintained version. We will consider patching POI 4, but only in exceptional cases. We would really prefer if you used POI 5. There are known issues in libs that POI depends on and you should be able, in many cases, to just upgrade the lib th

Inquiries about apache poi 4.x maintenance

hi. I'm Tae-eun Kim. I'm Developing using apache poi version 4.1.2. During the security review of the software, it was pointed out that the poi version was not up to date. I wonder if the poi development team will continue to manage security issues in the 4.x version. I plan to upgrade to p