Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-OpenJDK #546

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-Maven #699

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 62872] Writing large files with 800k rows gives java.io.IOException: This archive contains unclosed entries.

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62872 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Beeker --- Patched via r1845629 The change now implicitly sets the stream entry to 64bit based on the given filesize, the others stream entries stay in normal mode (... I guess ...) I've compared the sheet content

[Bug 62872] Writing large files with 800k rows gives java.io.IOException: This archive contains unclosed entries.

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62872 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Beeker --- It is a shaded exception complaining about the 4gb limit. When using "zos.setUseZip64(Zip64Mode.Always)" the test runs through successfully, but the result can't be opened in Libre Office I'm now checking

[Bug 62872] Writing large files with 800k rows gives java.io.IOException: This archive contains unclosed entries.

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62872 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Beeker --- My guess is, this is a shaded exception in SXSSFWorkbook.injectData. If you add some checkpoint variables in, it will enter the "finally" for "zos.closeArchiveEntry()", but actually doesn't finish it. --

[Bug 62836] [PATCH] Implementation of Excel TREND function

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62836 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Becht --- (In reply to Yegor Kozlov from comment #8) > Patched applied in r1845586. The fix will be included in upcoming 4.0.1 > release Sorry that it took me so long to reply, I was fairly busy this week. That se

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-Maven #698

See Changes: [yegor] Bug 62836: Implementation of Excel TREND function -- [...truncated 85.74 KB...] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec - in

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #545

The condition is `next != -1` but the value of next appears to -1 so that this condition is false. Maybe the condition should `next == -1` -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubs

[Bug 62836] [PATCH] Implementation of Excel TREND function

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62836 Yegor Kozlov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #545

Autoboxing?! On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 7:27 AM Tim Allison wrote: > > Colleagues, any idea what might be going on? How can -1 != -1?! > > Error: Test with 2/3: Should not find 3 but found it at -1 in 0 1 2 > at org.apache.poi.hwpf.usermodel.TestBug47563.test(TestBug47563.java:80) > > assertTrue("Tes

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #545

Colleagues, any idea what might be going on? How can -1 != -1?! Error: Test with 2/3: Should not find 3 but found it at -1 in 0 1 2 at org.apache.poi.hwpf.usermodel.TestBug47563.test(TestBug47563.java:80) assertTrue("Test with " + rows + "/" + columns + ": Should not find " + i + " but found it a