[Bug 54353] different colors of chart

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54353 --- Comment #4 from Greg Woolsey --- If the file specifies to use Excel's default color palette, that depends on the document or system theme colors. "Automatic" setting doesn't store the color info in the XLSX document. Thus two different in

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 --- Comment #2 from Javen O'Neal --- Nevermind. Looks like this claims to be a Word 2.0 file. http://www.filesignatures.net/index.php?page=search&search=DBA52D00&mode=SIG > DB A5 2D 00 Word 2.0 file, ASCII -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug 54353] different colors of chart

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54353 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement -- You are receiving this

[Bug 58294] Pivot Table corrupted when saving an xlsx workbook

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Summary|File crashes

[Bug 54353] different colors of chart

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54353 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 57332] FormulaEvaluator with external references

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57332 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #7 from Javen O'Ne

[Bug 61267] Extract text from Microsoft Word 2.0 (pre-OLE2) document

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Meta data of attached word |Extract text from Microsoft

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Javen O'Ne

[Bug 60685] Unable to parse .pub files -java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 88

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Component|POI Overall |HPBF --- Comment #3 from Javen O'Neal

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #199

See Changes: [kiwiwings] font rendering - handle a few system dependent textbox sizes [fanningpj] [Bug-61268] avoid NegativeArraySizeException parsing doc file [fanningpj] fix spelling [kiwiwings] use excel exte

[Bug 60685] Unable to parse .pub files -java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 88

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685 --- Comment #2 from Javen O'Neal --- The last real change to supporting HPBF hyperlinks was nearly 9 years ago, and even then the commit message indicated partial hyperlink support. So it's quite likely that we haven't fully implemented all hyp

[Bug 60685] Unable to parse .pub files -java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 88

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685 --- Comment #1 from Javen O'Neal --- Knowing nothing about the Compound File Binary Format (is this the same as or a predecessor to OLE2 containers?) [1.2] CHNKINK record offset = 0x8200 QC Bit offset = 0x8340 - 0x8200 = 0x0140 Annotated conte

[Bug 61268] NegativeArraySizeException on doc file picture

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: TestFonts failing on my laptop

I'm temporarily commented out the assertion that was failing. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1801395 -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/TestFonts-failing-on-my-laptop-tp5728134p5728135.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive

Re: TestFonts failing on my laptop

Although the .ttf-Font is provided, the rendering can be quite different. [1] That's the reason, why I'm trying to also execute the Job on the Windows machines too - currently I'm playing around with Jenkins pipeline syntax. What happens if you change something in GraphicsEnvironment.prefer*() ?

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 --- Comment #6 from PJ Fanning --- POI 3.16 / Tika 1.15 S3-142235/S3-142235 Comments on S3-142030 VF proposal TR 33969-071_rm.doc Caused by: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException at org.apache.poi.ddf.UnknownEscherRecord.fillFields(Unk

TestFonts failing on my laptop

Hi, The new test, TestFonts, is failing on my laptop. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1801329 I have a Mac and the font size seems to be 399 instead of the 312 expected in the test. java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<399.0> but was:<312.0> at org.junit.Assert.fail(As

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 --- Comment #5 from gaurav.c...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 35107 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35107&action=edit 2014 doc file File size is 6 MB. It can be downloaded from below link: http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_

[Bug 61268] NegativeArraySizeException on doc file picture

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Parse Failed|NegativeArraySizeException

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #4 from gaurav.

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Severity|critical

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 --- Comment #2 from gaurav.c...@gmail.com --- Thanks for response! This is a new file 2015 file not an old file. I am just testing it to see if it can be used in comparison to Other options. Have a good day ahead! -- You are receiving th

Re: Java 6 support

> My 2 cents is that we could continue to support a 3.x branch and backport security fixes and fixes that would be generally useful to a wide community. I could get behind back porting security fixes since they're fairly infrequent and small. Fully maintaining a branch would get tricky as the cod

Re: Java 6 support

> Andi just tried to use more generics in some places and this showed a > problem either in Java 9 or Java 6 and thus he reverted this change again. AFAIK this also happened when I've refactored the SL Common interfaces, but I've forgotten about it :S This is a bug in Java 6 ... there are a few

[Bug 61268] Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 PJ Fanning changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from PJ Fanning --- g

[Bug 61268] New: Parse Failed

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268 Bug ID: 61268 Summary: Parse Failed Product: POI Version: 3.16-dev Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: POI Overall

Re: Java 6 support

Hi, POI is already fully working on Java 9 (at least according to our unit-tests at https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-DSL-1.9/, and I once ran the full regression suite with some pre-release of Java 9 to check for additional problems.), there are some module-adjustment that are nec

[Bug 61182] Invalid signature created for streamed xlsx file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61182 Andreas Beeker changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Invalid signature created |Invalid signature created

Re: Java 6 support

I favour more regular non-beta releases generally and like the idea of a 4.0 release. I'm pretty neutral on the JRE version support. My employers mandate JRE 1.8 usage and I think, for security reasons, this is the right approach. My 2 cents is that we could continue to support a 3.x branch and bac

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-1.6 #398

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 61266] Extract text from Microsoft Write document

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 --- Comment #7 from Nick Burch --- I've added a more helpful exception for these files in r1801376, based on the mime magic from Apache Tika for them -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-Maven #259

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Java 6 support

Then let's kick XMLBeans to POI 5.0 and drop Java 6 ASAP if it's preventing Java 9 support. Java 9 is just around the corner (July 27). We should aim to support Java 9 the day it's released so we're not a reason for other software projects to delay Java 9 adoption. Have we addressed the open iss

Re: Java 6 support

+1 for switching now or after POI 3.17 ... if we will do a 3.17 final soonish. I'm actually bringing this up, as I was facing again problems with generics bugs in Java 6 and independently had a devops discussion with fluxo yesterday, questioning me/us why we are still on Java 6 level. > If we'r

Re: svn commit: r1801373 - in /poi/trunk/src: java/org/apache/poi/sl/usermodel/ ooxml/testcases/org/apache/poi/sl/

Is this a bug in the JVM implementation or are self-referential generics not allowed per the Java 6 language spec? Are our jenkins slaves using the latest version of Java 6? Looks like Java 6 and 9 support are mutually exclusive here. Time to drop Java 6 support. On Jul 9, 2017 5:27 PM, wrote:

Re: Java 6 support

The Android dev team have been making progress on Java 8 support, including 3rd party libraries, though currently still is a subset of the full Java 8 language specification. There will be more problems with Android API level <=23 (Marshmallow and older). https://developer.android.com/studio/writ

Re: Java 6 support

Hi, +1 for Java 7 in POI 4 after 3.17 is out. And I for not investing too much in backwards compatibility, people on Java 6 likely still run POI 3.9 anyway. I'm -1 on Java 8, as 7 is still needed for Android AFAIK and we get a number of requests in that area lately. Dominik On Jul 9, 2017 16:10

Re: Java 6 support

> (writing an iterator in Java is particularly painful). We could also leapfrog Java 7 and go straight to Java 8 with support for streams and lambdas. And yes, it's a can of worms to try to compile Java 7/8 source to Java 6 bytecode. It shouldn't be, as that's one of the glorious things about inte

Re: Java 6 support

+1 I'm in favor of dropping Java 6 support. If users still need to run new versions of POI on old JVMs, they should be able to cross-compile, though it may require some extra tools on their end to modify the bytecode to be compatible with and old JVM. If we can figure out a way to maintain binary

[Bug 61266] Extract text from Microsoft Write document

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Extract text from old Word |Extract text from Microsoft

[Bug 61266] Extract text from old Word file from 1991

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|File not parsing|Extract text from old Word

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement --- Comment #5 from Javen O

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #198

See Changes: [kiwiwings] SL Common: narrow generics definition because of tighter java9 checks -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 --- Comment #4 from Javen O'Neal --- If this is a 1991 Word file, then perhaps HWPFOldDocument (for Word 6 and Word 95) should be used instead of HWPFDocument (BIFF8). It's possible that this file format predates Word 6. Not sure if POI or Tik

Re: Java 6 support

It has been a while that we've discussed this topic ... or at least I couldn't find another more recent/decent thread ... [1] How about switching to Java 7 now? If we'd do, will we change to version 4 then? Andi [1] http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Java-6-support-td5721373.html -- Vi

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-Maven #258

See Changes: [kiwiwings] SL Common: narrow generics definition because of tighter java9 checks -- [...truncated 3.49 KB...] drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 25 2016 lib

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major -- You are receiving thi

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #3 from gaurav.

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Component|POI Overall

Jenkins build is back to normal : POI-DSL-1.9 #42

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Javen O'Neal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Javen O'Ne

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.6 #397

See Changes: [kiwiwings] SL Common: narrow generics definition because of tighter java9 checks -- [...truncated 8.39 KB...] 1800K .. .. .. ..

[Bug 61266] File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All CC|

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All Severity|normal

[Bug 61267] Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 gaurav.c...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaurav.c...@gmail.com -- You a

[Bug 61267] New: Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267 Bug ID: 61267 Summary: Meta data of attached word file gets parsed. However, content of file is not parsed and is blank Product: POI Version: 3.16-dev Hardware: PC

[Bug 61266] New: File not parsing

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266 Bug ID: 61266 Summary: File not parsing Product: POI Version: 3.16-dev Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: POI Overal

Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.9 #41

See Changes: [kiwiwings] test environment via ant - not via the shell - hope that makes sense ... [kiwiwings] add .ttf to ignored test integration resources [kiwiwings] #61169 - Text with Japanese characters overflows

[Bug 61265] AIOOBE when reading doc file (Section table parsing)

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61265 --- Comment #7 from gaurav.c...@gmail.com --- HOw to resave the file from doc to docx while retaining the original file meta data (especially content creation date)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ---