Thanks, Andi.
Looks like Maven Central has the artifacts now. Other mirrors may not be up
to date, though.
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.poi%22
On Jun 27, 2017 16:31, "Andreas Beeker" wrote:
> This vote has passed with 4x PMC +1 and 1x PMC 0 votes.
>
> I release t
This vote has passed with 4x PMC +1 and 1x PMC 0 votes.
I release the artifacts now and announce the release on the website,
when I see the files on maven central.
Andi
On 6/27/17 10:41 PM, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> +0 from me. I didn't have time to review this release.
>
> On Jun 27, 2017 7:48 AM,
I implemented the current table formula handling, based on a patch I found
languishing in the bug database. It's been a year or so, but here's what I
remember:
Data Table syntax works in most cases, but there is definitely room for
more test cases looking for bugs in less common scenarios - Unico
Greg Woolsey has provided quite a few improvements on Table support for
XSSF recently (last 6-12 months).
Question to the devs: Are tables part of the XLS binary file format, and if
so are users interested in a common SS Table interface?
Question to Robert: Is LLNL particularly interested in usin
+0 from me. I didn't have time to review this release.
On Jun 27, 2017 7:48 AM, "Greg Woolsey" wrote:
> +1
>
> So far so good in my tests, no sudden slow downs in my performance cases.
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, 05:15 Allison, Timothy B.
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Checksums and sig are good. Bui
Github user pjfanning closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/60
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Hi,
I'm a summer student at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and was hired to
find or implement POI's table formulas and matrix functions.
Over the last week or so, I have checked the POI page/Contributor guidelines
and have looked through the source code for handling this functionality.
+1
So far so good in my tests, no sudden slow downs in my performance cases.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, 05:15 Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> +1
>
> Checksums and sig are good. Built/tested on Windows.
>
> Thank you, Andi!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stad...@
+1
Checksums and sig are good. Built/tested on Windows.
Thank you, Andi!
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stad...@gmx.at]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 9:11 AM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.17-beta1 release (RC1)
Hi,
I compared the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60707
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||61213
Referenced Bugs:
https://bz.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61213
Dominik Stadler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||60707
Referenced Bugs:
https://bz.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61213
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Stadler ---
You can take a look at the FAQ at http://poi.apache.org/faq.html#faq-N10165, it
points to a sample which we used for comparing raw performance of
HSSF/XSSF/SXSSF in the past.
--
You are receiving this m
12 matches
Mail list logo