Re: [VOTE] - Merge SCM-HA Branch - HDDS-2823

+1, Thanks all for the great work! Regards, Rakesh On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:28 PM Shashikant Banerjee wrote: > Hey all, > > The support for SCM HA for ozone has been put together in: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2823 > > The github feature branch is here: > https://github.com

[VOTE] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

Hi All, I would like to propose prefix based FileSystem Optimizations (FSO) work HDDS-2939 merging into Ozone master branch. This optimization is intended to support atomic rename and delete operations in Ozone namespace. Presently, a rename/delet

[DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

Hi All, I'm really sorry for the wrong subject line. It is a [DISCUSS] thread and not a VOTE thread. Please excuse me. Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 3:14 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to propose prefix based FileSystem Optimizations (FSO) wo

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

FSO > hasn't been completed yet. > > On 2021/4/5, 5:49 PM, "Rakesh Radhakrishnan" wrote: > > External Email > > Hi All, > > I'm really sorry for the wrong subject line. It is a [DISCUSS] thread > and > not a VOTE thread. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

Thank you very much Yiqun and Marton for the feedback/useful comments. Please find my responses below. @Yiqun, As per the discussions, key deletion tasks have been implemented and the basic functionality of #listKeys works as expected and will be improving it further after merging the feature to m

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge Non rolling upgrade branch - 'HDDS-3698-nonrolling-upgrade'

+1 for the merge. Thank you Aravindan for driving this. Sure, we will work together to handle HDDS-2939, integration task. Regards, Rakesh On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:34 PM Aravindan Vijayan wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to propose merging the work done for supporting non rolling > upgra

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

Thank you very much @Yiqun for the reply and taking the discussion ahead! Thanks a lot @Marton for the feedback. We were working on the review comments and that caused a delay in my reply. All the points/tasks are addressed and I've updated the wiki page

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

Hi, Thanks everyone for the useful feedback, comments and contributions. All the points/tasks are addressed now and I'm planning to start a vote thread early next week. Thanks, Rakesh On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:08 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi All, > > It seems that th

[VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

Hi All, Based on the positive feedback from the merge DISCUSS thread , I'd like to start a formal VOTE to merge HDDS-2939 branch to master. The support for Prefix based FSO

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

> > > Thanks, > > > Sadanand > > > > > >> On Mon, May 31, 2021, 1:28 PM Mukul Kumar Singh < > > mksingh.apa...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 for the merge. > > >> > > >> Th

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

The vote passes with 15 +1's and no -1's. Thank you very much all for participating in the vote and for the great support! We will merge the HDDS-2939 branch to master soon. Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 1:24 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi All, > > Ba

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

Thank you very much Yiqun for the great support! Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:16 AM Lin, Yiqun wrote: > +1. > > Thanks for the very great work, Rakesh. > > Thanks, > Yiqun > > On 2021/6/6, 9:12 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: > > External Email > > +1 > > Thanks Rakesh the wo

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

I've merged the feature branch 'HDDS-2939' to master. Thanks everyone for all the contributions and continuous support! Thanks Rakesh On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 11:10 PM Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > The vote passes with 15 +1's and no -1's. > > Thank you very

Re: [VOTE] - Merge Non rolling upgrade branch - 'HDDS-3698-nonrolling-upgrade'

+1 for the merge. Thanks for driving this Aravindan. Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:34 PM Aravindan Vijayan wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to start a formal VOTE to merge the non-rolling upgrades in Ozone > (HDDS-3698-nonrolling-upgrade) into the Ozone master branch. Please refer

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to merge Ozone Erasure Coding branch (HDDS-3816-ec) into master

+1 for merging EC into master branch. Thanks @Uma for putting this together. Kudos to everyone who contributed to this feature! Best, Rakesh On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:48 PM Uma gangumalla wrote: > Dear Ozone Devs, > > As you may know, we have been actively developing Ozone Erasure Coding > sup