Hi All,
Please raise if you have any concerns. Otherwise we will move forward
with this approach.
Regards,
Uma
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 5:12 AM Elek, Marton wrote:
>
> Thanks the feedback Arpit,
>
> We don't need to replace the old replcationFactor field, we can keep it
> for compatibility r
Thanks the feedback Arpit,
We don't need to replace the old replcationFactor field, we can keep it
for compatibility reasons. If the old field is used by any client it can
be used during the de-/serialziation instead of the new object.
With this approach we don't need to be worried about co
The idea sounds reasonable. Compatibility is an open question. We will have to
bring this change through the upgrade framework since there will be changes to
OM on-disk formats.
Upgrades and downgrades will be tricky IAC. It needs more thought.
Thanks,
Arpit
> On Mar 11, 2021, at 9:52 AM, Um
