Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

I'm sorry I missed your comment. I think we are community-based and we'd like our community to adopt Ozone. If Hadoop2 is still being used by the community then we may have to support it. Maybe we can advertise it as "deprecated" and remove it the next major release (hopefully not in another 4 yea

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 for Ozone 2.0. I would like to learn more about the following: > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support. This may require users who are using the Hadoop2 client to do additional work to be compatible with ozone. We are currently using Hadoop client version 2.7. Is it possible to find a friendl

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

Thanks for the feedback! I've captured the comments and also reviewed recent feature developments in the JIRA, and took a stab at a release plan: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-OLE3IUKZH4zVsPVlUxwNho7MVuoBUwbAgbLMPzouMc/edit?usp=sharing Let's say Timeline: - End of August: Draft rel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

Thanks a lot for driving this Wei-Chiu, I'm +1 for deprecating legacy buckets and o3fs as well. The release plan will need to specify how these deprecations are implemented and what the impacts will be. For example, legacy buckets will likely remain readable and writable but creation of new ones wi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

We will keep OBS for sure. I'm coming up with a release plan. Will share it shortly. On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:50 PM Kohei Sugihara wrote: > Hi, all > > > I'd also like to propose to deprecate > > LEGACY bucket type > > Can we keep using the OBS bucket type after the deprecation? > > 2024年8月28

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

Hi, all > I'd also like to propose to deprecate > LEGACY bucket type Can we keep using the OBS bucket type after the deprecation? 2024年8月28日(水) 8:32 Wei-Chiu Chuang : > I'd also like to propose to deprecate > > LEGACY bucket type > O3fs file system > IIRC we're still testing Hadoop 3.1 and 3.2

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

I'd also like to propose to deprecate LEGACY bucket type O3fs file system IIRC we're still testing Hadoop 3.1 and 3.2 runtime. Can we drop it too? Anything else? On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:12 PM Guo Hao wrote: > +1 for Ozone 2.0 > > > At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: > >+1 for Ozon

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 for Ozone 2.0 At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: >+1 for Ozone 2.0 > >> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support. > >It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3. However, it >will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait till >Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, i

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 for Ozone 2.0 > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support. It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3. However, it will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait till Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years. @Wei-Chiu Chuang , thanks a lot for starting

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now. HDDS-9225 Good opportunity for optics. On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien wrote: > +1 > > Wei-Chiu Chuang 於 2024年8月23日 週五 上午6:31 寫道： > > > Hi, > > I want to throw out

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 Wei-Chiu Chuang 於 2024年8月23日 週五 上午6:31 寫道： > Hi, > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead. > > Reason being: > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support. > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and > functionalities have changed so much. > (

[DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

Hi, I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead. Reason being: (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support. (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and functionalities have changed so much. (3) The HBase support is a significant change. (4) While Snapshot

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

Should we wait for another Ratis dependency update to pick the work done around zero copy? On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:18 PM Maxim Myskov wrote: > I would be glad to volunteer as the release manager for the 1.5.0 release. > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:23 PM Ethan Rose wrote: > > > +1 to start pl

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

I would be glad to volunteer as the release manager for the 1.5.0 release. On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:23 PM Ethan Rose wrote: > +1 to start planning for 1.5.0. Our minor releases tend to take some time > so it's good to start early. For any committers looking to gain more > experience volunteeri

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

Oh actually I forgot to mention: What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2 was two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all. Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain. On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 It would be good to get all snapshot related critical fixes in this release. (some fixes are in the pipeline) Regards, Prashant > On Aug 22, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Ethan Rose wrote: > > +1 to start planning for 1.5.0. Our minor releases tend to take some time > so it's good to start early. For

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 to start planning for 1.5.0. Our minor releases tend to take some time so it's good to start early. For any committers looking to gain more experience volunteering as release manager is a great way to do that. We have a release guide

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 for a .0 release with full HBase support. Best, Sid On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > Hi community, > > I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There have been > significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130 commits >

[DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

Hi community, I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There have been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130 commits added to the git history. I think it’s a good time to start planning for the ne