Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release

+1 It would be good to get all snapshot related critical fixes in this release. (some fixes are in the pipeline) Regards, Prashant > On Aug 22, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Ethan Rose wrote: > > +1 to start planning for 1.5.0. Our minor releases tend to take some time > so it's good to start early. For

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Ozone major release 1.4.0

Thanks for working on the release Yiyang. Snapshot feature is also ready for release. Regards, Prashant > On Jul 26, 2023, at 12:10 AM, Janus Chow wrote: > > Hello, Dev, > >This is a addendum for last topic summary. > > Tag Count URL > Snapshot 127 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/H

Re: Cutting Ozone 1.3.1

+1 Regards, Prashant > On Mar 15, 2023, at 4:06 PM, Neil Joshi wrote: > > To note: HDDS-8173 > The critical fixes minor release should include a recently uncovered issue > HDDS-8173 with schema V3 datanode rocksdb on container delete if it proves > to need a patch to resolve. > > +1 on critica

Re: [VOTE] Proposal to merge HttpFS support in Ozone feature branch (HDDS-5447-httpfs) into master

+1 > On Mar 2, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Arpit Agarwal > wrote: > > +1 > >> On Feb 27, 2023, at 7:00 AM, Zita Dombi wrote: >> >> Hi Ozone Devs! >> >> I’m starting this vote thread for merging the HttpFS Support in Ozone >> feature branch (HDDS-5447

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to merge HttpFS support in Ozone feature branch (HDDS-5447-httpfs) into master

+1 Prashant > On Feb 9, 2023, at 2:50 AM, NILOTPAL NANDI wrote: > > +1 for the merge (non-binding). > > - Nilotpal Nandi > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:57 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -Ayush >> >>> On 09-Feb-2023, at 7:41 AM, Neil Joshi wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> Thanks! >>> Regards,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Proposal to merge HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots

Yup, we are on top of it. Thanks, Prashant > On Jan 27, 2023, at 12:34 AM, Attila Doroszlai wrote: > > Hi Prashant, > >> We will go ahead and merge the Snapshot branch into master. > > There is a new integration test that has been failing consistently > since it was introduced on the feature

[RESULT] [VOTE] Proposal to merge HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots

Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 6:08 AM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> Tsz-Wo >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 3:26 AM Siddharth Wagle >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for the

[VOTE] Proposal to merge HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots

We would like to start this Vote thread for the proposal to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots. Ozone Snapshot feature allows us to take a point in time frozen image of the Ozone dataset. Initially this feature

[VOTE] Proposal to merge HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots

We would like to start this Vote thread for the proposal to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots. Ozone Snapshot feature allows us to take a point in time frozen image of the Ozone dataset. Initially this feature

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to merge HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots

Thanks for the feedback Ethan, Uma and Sid. I have updated the template on the wiki with Jira tickets to address these concerns. > On Jan 11, 2023, at 11:23 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla > wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6851 >

[DISCUSS] Proposal to merge HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots

Dear Ozone Devs, We would like to start this discussion thread for the proposal to merge https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots. Ozone Snapshot feature allows us to take a point in time frozen image of the Ozone dataset. Initially this feature would allow snapshots to be

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to merge HDDS-4454 Ozone Streaming Write Pipeline into master

+1 for the merge. Regards, Prashant > On Dec 7, 2022, at 1:32 AM, Sadanand Shenoy wrote: > > +1 for the merge. > > Thanks, > Sadanand > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 12:01 PM Kaijie Chen wrote: > >> +1 for merging. >> >> Hope it can be tested more in master branch and become stable soon. >>

[Discuss] Snapshot Feature Proposal

Hi, We are proposing Snapshot feature for the Ozone under HDDS-6517 . with this Jira, we have attached the following docs with details - requirements doc - API spec - Intial Design proposal - Supporting feature docs with this Jira. We are also w

Re: [VOTE] Merge Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy feature branch (HDDS-4944) into master

+1 > On May 23, 2022, at 8:40 PM, Siyao Meng wrote: > > Dear Ozone devs, > >I am starting this vote thread for merging the Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy > feature branch (HDDS-4944) to the master branch. > > S3 multi-tenancy allows multiple S3-accessible volumes to be created. > Each volume can

Re: [VOTE] Merge Ozone Erasure Coding branch (HDDS-3816-ec) into master

+1 for the EC branch merge. Regards, Prashant > On Apr 6, 2022, at 8:20 PM, Siddharth Wagle wrote: > > +1 for the EC branch merge. > > Best, > Sid > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:05 PM guimark wrote: > >> Great news! >> +1 to merge. >> >> >> >> >> At 2022-04-06 22:18:31, "Stephen O'Donnell

Re: Update and design decision on HDDS-5905

Hi Kota, I went through your proposal and it looks good. Let us discuss this in our next ozone community meeting as well. Let us connect on apache slack. Regards, Prashant > On Jan 27, 2022, at 11:50 PM, Kota Uenishi wrote: > > Hi Ozone dev, > > I once proposed fix for HDDS-5905, but it's b

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.2.0 release

+1, thanks Thanks for volunteering! > On Aug 25, 2021, at 11:28 AM, Aravindan Vijayan > wrote: > > Hello all, > > It has been a few months since the Ozone 1.1.0 release, and we have had a > number of features (SCM HA, FSO, Non rolling upgrades) that have been > merged to master since then. I t

Multi-tenant support in Ozone and Ozone Volume Accessibility through S3 compatible APIs

Hello all! We have created a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-4944 for tracking this work.We have iterated on the requirements and design based on the comments and feedback. All the latest documents have been uploaded on the Jira.

Re: [VOTE] - Merge Non rolling upgrade branch - 'HDDS-3698-nonrolling-upgrade'

+1 to merge > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:04 AM Aravindan Vijayan > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I'd like to start a formal VOTE to merge the non-rolling upgrades in Ozone >> (HDDS-3698-nonrolling-upgrade) into the Ozone master branch. Please refer >> to the DISCUSS mail for the details of the d

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 release

ne still Apache Hadoop >> Ozone? >>>> Since Ozone is now one of the Apache top-level projects, shouldn't it be >>>> called Apache Ozone? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Maru >>>> >>>> >>>> >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ozone 1.1.0 release

e? > > Regards, > Maru > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:44 AM Prashant Pogde > wrote: > >> Hi Sammi, >> >> Yup. I will update the ozone.apache.org <http://ozone.apache.org/> as >> well. >> >> Thanks, >> Prashant >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 release

che.org/ too? > > > Bests, > Sammi > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:46 AM Prashant Pogde > wrote: > >> I am happy to announce that the Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 has been >> released. >> >> The release details, including links to downloads, lis

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 release

I am happy to announce that the Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 has been released. The release details, including links to downloads, list of major features are on the 1.1.0 announcement page [1]. You can also download the release from the Downloads page [2]. Versioned documentation is available on the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC2

er with downloaded binary package > - Run TestDFSIO write/read > - Put/got object through aws s3api CLI > > > BR, > Sammi > > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Prashant Pogde > wrote: > >> This is a new Voting thread for Ozone 1.1.0 RC2. >> >

[VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC2

/by-fingerprint/0275D608D6ECD2FA188CFB1B97A88E48DF143C67> *The vote will run for 6 days, ending on April 14th 2021 at 11:59 pm PST.* Thanks, Prashant Pogde

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC1

Thanks Xiaoyu and Attila. Looks like we will need RC2. > On Apr 8, 2021, at 1:12 PM, Xiaoyu Yao wrote: > > Hit the similar issue when building from source failed with missing > dev-support/byteman. > HDDS-5077 should fix the issue but we do need a new RC here to continue the > vote. > > Thanks,

[VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC1

vks/v1/by-fingerprint/0275D608D6ECD2FA188CFB1B97A88E48DF143C67> *The vote will run for 7 days, ending on April 14th 2021 at 11:59 pm PST.* Thanks, Prashant Pogde

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0 (rc1?)

about the common release process)) > > Sorry if it was not clear from the wiki page (I will try to update it and > clarify if we have an agreement) > > And thanks for all the work to make ozone 1.1.0 real: <3 > > Thanks, > Marton > > > > On 4/7/21 5:01 P

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0 (rc1?)

hanges required for 1.1.0 release are already in the apache:1.1.0-RC0 branch. Once We get a Yes vote, this can be merged with upstream and would be in official apache:1.1.0-RC0 branch. Regards, Prashant > On Apr 7, 2021, at 7:55 AM, Prashant Pogde wrote: > > I had not committed the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0 (rc1?)

. > On Apr 6, 2021, at 11:54 PM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > > On 4/7/21 8:32 AM, Prashant Pogde wrote: >> Refreshed artifacts at >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1301/ >> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

1.1.0-rc0/> Regards, Prashant > On Apr 6, 2021, at 8:07 PM, Prashant Pogde wrote: > > I need to rebase it on committed changes in 1.1.0-RC0 branch. I will refresh > these links. > >> On Apr 6, 2021, at 3:19 PM, Prashant Pogde > <mailto:ppo...@cloudera.com>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

I need to rebase it on committed changes in 1.1.0-RC0 branch. I will refresh these links. > On Apr 6, 2021, at 3:19 PM, Prashant Pogde wrote: > > Thanks @Elek, Marton and @Aravindan for the review. > I have updated the repository and artifacts at > > https://home.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Thanks @Elek, Marton and @Aravindan for the review. I have updated the repository and artifacts at https://home.apache.org/~prashantpogde/ozone-1.1.0-rc0/ And https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1300/ <

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

cing the issue and it would be great to use the official release other than > inner build snapshot jars to solve the problem. > Thanks in advance. > >> On 6 Apr 2021, at 11:27 PM, Prashant Pogde >> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the review. I will fix this and update t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Thanks for the review. I will fix this and update the artifacts. > On Apr 6, 2021, at 2:22 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > ot be a

Re: [DISCUSS] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

+1 -Prashant > On Apr 5, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh > wrote: > > +1, This feature will be a great addition to Ozone. > > - Mukul > > On 05/04/21 8:03 pm, Lin, Yiqun wrote: >> +1 for merging to master after resolved current few block subtasks. >> Currently, I see listKey implementat

[VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

/0275D608D6ECD2FA188CFB1B97A88E48DF143C67 *The vote will run for 7 days, ending on April 9th 2021 at 11:59 pm PST.* Thanks, Prashant Pogde

Re: [VOTE] - Merge SCM-HA Branch - HDDS-2823

I have created 1.1.0-RC0 branch and we can promote this branch to 1.1.0 later. We can continue merge to master. > On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:08 PM, Prashant Pogde wrote: > > +1 > > I will update the thread once we have cut the 1.1 branch. > > Thanks > Prashant > >

Re: [VOTE] - Merge SCM-HA Branch - HDDS-2823

+1 I will update the thread once we have cut the 1.1 branch. Thanks Prashant > On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Siddharth Wagle > wrote: > > +1 for merging this important feature. We should merge this into master > right after cutting out the 1.1 branch. > > Thank you for all the community effo

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.1.0 release

Thanks, Dinesh, Sid, Yup, I would like to manage 1.1.0 release. Regards, Prashant > Sid, > Sounds good to me if Prashant already expressed interest. > Cheers, > Dinesh