Yes, the proposal is that we empower users to share buckets if they desire.
S3V is available via the ofs:// path today itself. The buckets of both
types can be made accessible both ways. The idea here is the default
behavior is compatible with the protocol via which they are used, and an
informed u
Thanks for your work on this doc!
Thanks for the proposal for a solution to access buckets with different
layouts through s3g and ofs. A few points:
In the document it states as a convention to use symbolic links from FSO
buckets to s3v for s3g access. This is fine. Buckets created by s3g by
c
