Re: Design doc to fix HDDS-5905

2021-10-28 Thread Lokesh Jain
Hey Kota I really like the proposed approach because it makes sure that blocks are deleted in order of key deletion. I would suggest using Ratis transaction id as the prefix. I don’t think we will need a random suffix with that approach as transaction id would avoid any collisions. Further it a

some actual usage of the project

2021-10-28 Thread lec ssmi
Hi: I just checked the 1.1.0 document and found that it hasn't been updated for more than a year. And what companies are currently using this technology? We want to use it in production , but we don't have enough manpower to do maintenance work, so we want to see what experience we ca

Design doc to fix HDDS-5905

2021-10-28 Thread Kota Uenishi
Hi Bharat & devs, I've written up some of my idea to fix HDDS-5905, which is a block-leak issue mentioned by Bharat. It involves some data format change in deletion table, so I want to get broader range of feedback from committers in addition to Bharat. If it looks good to you, I want to start wri