Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

Thank you very much @weichiu for the feedback and voting. I believe you are mentioning the delete bugs in the master branch. I will fetch it and follow-up on those and validate those cases with the FSO feature code path. Since prefix based FSO has a new metadata layout structure the delete key pat

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

+1 for merging HDDS-2939 to master. Thanks for driving this Rakesh. On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:01 PM Arpit Agarwal wrote: > +1 for merging this feature to master. > > > > On May 31, 2021, at 12:54 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Based on the positive feedback from the me

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

+1 for merging this feature to master. > On May 31, 2021, at 12:54 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > > Hi All, > > Based on the positive feedback from the merge DISCUSS thread >

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

+1, Thanks Rakesh for your work on this. Shashikant Banerjee 于2021年6月3日周四 上午11:52写道： > +1 for the merge. Thanks for driving this Rakesh. > > Thanks > Shashi > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:17 AM Siddharth Wagle > > wrote: > > > +1 for the merge. Rakesh, thank you for working on this feature. > >

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

+1 for the merge. Thanks for driving this Rakesh. Thanks Shashi On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:17 AM Siddharth Wagle wrote: > +1 for the merge. Rakesh, thank you for working on this feature. > > Best, > Sid > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 5:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > > > I am +1. > > > > > > Reviewed t

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

+1 for the merge. Rakesh, thank you for working on this feature. Best, Sid On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 5:33 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > I am +1. > > > Reviewed the benchmark report and liked it a lot! Yes, the rename and > delete was terrible before. This is going to make certain application > operati

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FSO branch HDDS-2939 to master

I am +1. Reviewed the benchmark report and liked it a lot! Yes, the rename and delete was terrible before. This is going to make certain application operations much better, like Impala's delete table command. BTW there were a few delete bugs (lingering namespace garbage after delete, incorrect s