Re: Re: I have a problem with Ozone 1.0.0

Thank you for update:) The same issue when i configed the parameters you give me. [root@node219 hadoop]# cat ozone-site.xml ozone.om.address 192.168.21.219 OM, REQUIRED The address of the Ozone OM service. This allows clients to discover the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0 (rc1?)

On 4/7/21 8:32 AM, Prashant Pogde wrote: Refreshed artifacts at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1301/ Binaries at https://home.apache.org/~prashantpogde/ozone-1.1.0-rc0/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Refreshed artifacts at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1301/ Binaries at https://home.apache.org/~prashantpogde/ozone-1.1.0-rc0/

Re: Re: I have a problem with Ozone 1.0.0

These properties are required on both SCM and DN. And a cluster reboot is required. On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:44 AM dongyan...@nnct-nsn.com < dongyan...@nnct-nsn.com> wrote: > Thank you for update:) > > The same issue when i configed the parameters you give me. > > > > [root@node219 hadoop]# cat

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

I need to rebase it on committed changes in 1.1.0-RC0 branch. I will refresh these links. > On Apr 6, 2021, at 3:19 PM, Prashant Pogde wrote: > > Thanks @Elek, Marton and @Aravindan for the review. > I have updated the repository and artifacts at > > https://home.apache.org/~prashantpogde/oz

Re: I have a problem with Ozone 1.0.0

Hey dongyanhui ， >From the " ozone admin datanode list " output, we can see that there is only one THREE factor pipeline, which involves three datanode 219, 220, 225. I guess your data requires three replicas, so that your data is written to these three datanodes. To tuning the cluster, you c

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Thanks @Elek, Marton and @Aravindan for the review. I have updated the repository and artifacts at https://home.apache.org/~prashantpogde/ozone-1.1.0-rc0/ And https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1300/ <

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Oh, got it, thanks a lot. > On 6 Apr 2021, at 11:45 PM, Prashant Pogde > wrote: > > It is little late to include this in 1.1.0 RC0 at this point. > >> On Apr 6, 2021, at 8:35 AM, Janus Chow wrote: >> >> Thanks for the work. >> >> I was wondering if we can include this commit >> (https://is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

It is little late to include this in 1.1.0 RC0 at this point. > On Apr 6, 2021, at 8:35 AM, Janus Chow wrote: > > Thanks for the work. > > I was wondering if we can include this commit > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-5035) in 1.1.0, since we are now > facing the issue and it wou

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Thanks for the work. I was wondering if we can include this commit (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-5035) in 1.1.0, since we are now facing the issue and it would be great to use the official release other than inner build snapshot jars to solve the problem. Thanks in advance. > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Thanks for the review. I will fix this and update the artifacts. > On Apr 6, 2021, at 2:22 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > ot be a

Fwd: I have a problem with Ozone 1.0.0

Forwarded Message Subject:I have a problem with Ozone 1.0.0 Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:16:57 +0800 From: dongyan...@nnct-nsn.com To: issues Hi,Support! 1：I have installed the Ozone 1.0.1 sucessfully with 5 datanodes. [root@node221 logs]# ozone admin data

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.1.0 RC0

Thanks for this RC Prashant, I am very grateful as we released or last version very long time ago. On 4/5/21 11:52 PM, Aravindan Vijayan wrote: I see that the rc0 artifacts are incorrectly tagged as "*alpha*". Can we remove that from the artifact names? +1 I think the wiki page of th

Re: [VOTE] - Merge FileSystem Optimizations branch HDDS-2939 to master

Thank you very much to start the discussion Rakesh (and thanks to work on this.) As this is something which can greatly improve the performance for the FS use-cases, I am really exited. To make sure that we can guarantee the stability of the master branch, I would recommend to fill the "b