[ovs-dev] 答复: ????: ????: [ovs-discuss] [ovs]deleting interfaces connnected to ports results in ovs-vswitchd memory growing

very big(455532592). So I have two more questions. When will the ovs-vswitchd deal with the backlog successfully?? Is top command accurate to reflect the memory changes?? -邮件原件- 发件人: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com] 发送时间: 2013年4月19日 23:53 收件人: pengyi Peng(Yi) 抄送: disc...@openv

[ovs-dev] 答复: 答复: ????: ????: [ovs-discuss] [ovs]deleting interfaces connnected to ports results in ovs-vswitchd memory growing

ream_send returns -EAGAIN ? -邮件原件- 发件人: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com] 发送时间: 2013年4月24日 1:37 收件人: pengyi Peng(Yi) 抄送: disc...@openvswitch.org; Liuyongan; Zhangkun (K); dev@openvswitch.org 主题: Re: 答复: : : [ovs-discuss] [ovs]deleting interfaces connnected to ports results in ovs-vs

[ovs-dev] 答复: ????: ????: ????: ????: [ovs-discuss] [ovs]deleting interfaces connnected to ports results in ovs-vswitchd memory growing

o something to coalesce transactions or to skip some of them. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:34:31PM +, pengyi Peng(Yi) wrote: > Yes, after backlog comes back to zero, memory is freed, and the memory of > ovs-vswitchd stops growing. > > However, if stream_send always returns -EAGAIN, t