Is there any plan of DPDK-OVS support upstream vhost-user? It is merged in
qemu and libvirt 1.2.7, also with vif-vhostuser BP in openstack. I think
this will accelerate adoption of dpdkovs use in openstack.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://
Hi,
I see in the doc[1] that there is pkt_mark field, but I didn't find any
description in the ofctl manual. So, can I match against this field, and
set it in the action?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/de
sorry, forgot the link
http://benpfaff.org/~blp/ovs-fields.pdf
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:38 AM, loy wolfe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see in the doc[1] that there is pkt_mark field, but I didn't find any
> description in the ofctl manual. So, can I match against this field, and
>
hi,
how about connmark support: save_mark and restore_mark?
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
1) it's better to support connmark: save__mark & restore__mark, this
is very useful.
2) besides conntrack callback as an action, can we support other
netfilter chain hook callback(PREROUTING-raw, FORWARDING-filter...),
also as an action in the OVS flow table? This is not same as
linuxbridge iptabl