On Ubuntu depmod's search priority is configured in /etc/depmod to be
updates and then the kernel built-in directory.
$ cat /etc/depmod.d/ubuntu.conf
search updates ubuntu built-in
Thus change the placement of openvswitch.ko under updates/ not kernel/updates.
Signed-off-by: Saurabh
On 10/14/2015 04:58 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:28:24PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 15:21, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:35:32PM -0700, Saurabh Mohan wrote:
On Ubuntu depmod's s
On 10/14/2015 04:58 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:28:24PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 15:21, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:35:32PM -0700, Saurabh Mohan wrote:
On Ubuntu depmod's s
On 10/15/2015 01:55 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Saurabh Mohan
wrote:
On 10/14/2015 04:58 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:28:24PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 15:21, Ben
On 10/16/2015 11:32 AM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Saurabh Mohan
wrote:
On 10/15/2015 01:55 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Saurabh Mohan
wrote:
On 10/14/2015 04:58 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Ben Pfaff
after the other interface
scripts in /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/
Signed-off-by: Saurabh Mohan
---
debian/openvswitch-switch.links | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/openvswitch-switch.links b/debian/openvswitch-switch.links
index cf58073..5c7b1f1 1006
On 10/29/2015 04:42 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Saurabh Mohan
wrote:
Problem:
When the OVSPort is a vlan interface there is a sequencing issue when we try
to bring up the OVSBridge.
Consider the following configuration in /etc/network/interfaces
allow-ovs br
On 10/29/2015 05:19 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
I do however understand your concern with the proposed fix.
We are trying to stay agnostic to the underlay interface (eth, vlan,
bond...) and let the kernel handle it. Otherwise the controller would
have to be aware of the way each server connects
On 10/16/2015 01:55 PM, Saurabh Mohan wrote:
On 10/16/2015 11:32 AM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Saurabh Mohan
wrote:
On 10/15/2015 01:55 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Saurabh Mohan
wrote:
On 10/14/2015 04:58 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote
