On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 09:56 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Also, it might be interesting to add something like:
> > if ! type ovs-vsctl > /dev/null 2>&1; then
> I think type is a bash-ism but I don't know the portable alternativ
Package: openvswitch-switch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-8
Severity: grave
Subject: openvswitch-switch - Does not start with upstream openvswitch
Package: openvswitch-switch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-8
Severity: grave
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT
Package: openvswitch-switch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-8
Severity: grave
The openvswitch-switch init script fails if openvswitch included in
Linux should be used.
| # invoke-rc.d openvswitch-switch start
| FATAL: Module openvswitch_mod not found.
| Inserting openvswitch module ... failed!
| Modul
Package: openvswitch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-2
Severity: serious
The openvswitch-switch init script fails to start stuff if
/etc/protocols is missing. This file is provided by the non-essential
netbase, so it needs a dependency.
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT
Package: openvswitch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-2
Severity: serious
The openvswitch-switch init script modifies filter rules using iptables
without consent by the admin.
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstabl
Package: openvswitch-brcompat
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-2
Severity: normal
The standard way to configure bridges in Debian is using
/etc/network/interfaces. This is set up much earlier than the
openvswitch-switch init script is run, so this won't work.
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
reopen 680537
thanks
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 07:36:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #680537: openvswitch - Plays with iptables without consent
>* debian/control: Add "netbase" dependency to ensure that /etc/protocols
> is available. Closes: #680537.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 03:16:03PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 06:13:25PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The openvswitch-switch init script modifies filter rules using iptables
> > without consent by the admin.
> Where are the requirements spelled out?
Package: openvswitch-switch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-2
Severity: serious
openvswitch uses a db called /etc/openvswitch/conf.db. This file is
programmatic modified and not user editable. This violates §10.7 of the
policy.
/var/lib is the correct location for state data.
Bastian
-- System Infor
Package: openvswitch-brcompat
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-2
Severity: normal
Installing openvswitch-brcompat is not enough to actually enable it.
There is an additional switch in /etc/defaults/openvswitch-switch to
enable it.
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
Package: openvswitch-brcompat
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-2
Severity: serious
Enabling brcompat without openvswitch-brcompat installed or the module
available breaks the init script and normal operation without brcompat.
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers test
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:31:44AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:20:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > openvswitch uses a db called /etc/openvswitch/conf.db. This file is
> > programmatic modified and not user editable. This violates §10.7 of the
> >
Package: openvswitch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-5
Severity: serious
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 09:36:07PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The s390 build of openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-5 failed for a reason
> that I don't understand:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openvswitch&
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:50:10AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:57:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Enabling brcompat without openvswitch-brcompat installed or the module
> > available breaks the init script and normal operation without brcompat.
> I&#
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:01:42AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:00:49AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > No. It is no configuration file if it is not static.
> The FHS defines "static" as:
> "Static" files include binaries, libraries,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:47:24AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:55:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Installing openvswitch-brcompat is not enough to actually enable it.
> > There is an additional switch in /etc/defaults/openvswitch-switch to
> &
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:48:51PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> open() with O_CREAT|O_EXCL yields EEXIST if the file being opened is a
> symlink. lockfile_try_lock() interpreted that error code to mean that
> some other process had created the lock file in the meantime, so it went
> around its loop a
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:53:25PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 08:39:42AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I would always use the lock file at the target location of the database
> > and not follow symlinks there. Otherwise more than one lock file can
> >
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:08AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I was unclear. You should first use realpath(3) on the database filename
> > and calculate the lock file from there. Otherwise there may be several
> &g
19 matches
Mail list logo
