[ovs-dev] [PATCH] Add tests/kmod-testsuite to .gitignore

2015-01-19 Thread lojakab
From: Lorand Jakab Signed-off-by: Lorand Jakab --- tests/.gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tests/.gitignore b/tests/.gitignore index 11167fb..b4a54c9 100644 --- a/tests/.gitignore +++ b/tests/.gitignore @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ /idltest.c /idltest.h /idltest.ovsidl +/kmod

[ovs-dev] Master Slave Architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Gauri Bhutkar
Hello all, I have mininet 2.2.0 with OVS 2.3.0 installed , I attached one switch to more than one controller (Opendaylight) using script.I have referred this link for the same. http://windysdn.blogspot.in/ I want to give read write access to one controller (Make it master) and read only access to

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/16/15 at 04:28pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > We have not yet contemplated that, but it could be possible. > > In my opinion, OVS is not releasing often enough in any case. I think > that 3 or 4 releases a year is about right (but that's off the cuff, not > some kind of official policy or anything).

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Add tests/kmod-testsuite to .gitignore

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/19/15 at 01:11pm, loja...@cisco.com wrote: > From: Lorand Jakab > > Signed-off-by: Lorand Jakab Acked-by: Thomas Graf This is so obviously correct that I pushed this right to master ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.o

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] rconn: Remove dead code and data.

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/18/15 at 04:26pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > These functions had no callers, so remove them and the data maintained > just to implement them. > > Found by inspection. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff Acked-by: Thomas Graf ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswit

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] pktbuf: Always initialize '*bufferp' even when 'pb == NULL'.

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/17/15 at 09:21am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Otherwise if a service connection (which does not have buffers) attempts > to use buffers, '*bufferp' will be uninitialized, which can cause a > segfault in the caller. > > Found using OFtest configured to use service (active rather than passive) > connec

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fix typo in NEWS

2015-01-19 Thread Lorand Jakab
Signed-off-by: Lorand Jakab --- NEWS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 7c0e262..0a54820 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Post-v2.3.0 - New support for a "conjunctive match" OpenFlow extension, which allows constructing Open

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Dave Tucker
On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:04, Thomas Graf wrote: Agreed. I would expect that OVN might lead to more frequent releases of OVS with a more "stable at all times attitude" as OVN will depend on specific OVS features. This is my concern. For OVN to be useful in the context of OpenStack, we should b

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Fix typo in NEWS

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/19/15 at 03:45pm, Lorand Jakab wrote: > Signed-off-by: Lorand Jakab Acked-by: Thomas Graf Same here, pushed to master. ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] datapath-windows: Support for custom VXLAN tunnel port

2015-01-19 Thread Sorin Vinturis
Hi Eitan, I have not manage to successfully shortcut fast path. I have changed the netlink library to create the necessary socket in order for the packets to go through the filter, but the resulted vswitchd binary hangs when I execute it. Thus could not perform the test that shortcuts the fast

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Monday, 19 de January de 2015 at 15:32, Dave Tucker wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:04, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > Agreed. I would expect that OVN might lead to more frequent releases > > of OVS with a more "stable at all times attitude" as OVN will depend > > on > > specific OVS feature

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:04:42PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 01/16/15 at 04:28pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > We have not yet contemplated that, but it could be possible. > > > > In my opinion, OVS is not releasing often enough in any case. I think > > that 3 or 4 releases a year is about right (bu

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Dave Tucker
On 19 Jan 2015, at 16:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: Wasn’t OVN to be developed in C too? That's what was being discussed here based on a comment earlier in the thread. I'm just exploring whether there is a reason to consider using Python instead. I guess it really comes down to what version

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:32:02PM +, Dave Tucker wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:04, Thomas Graf wrote: > > >Agreed. I would expect that OVN might lead to more frequent releases > >of OVS with a more "stable at all times attitude" as OVN will depend on > >specific OVS features. > > This is

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:56:30PM +0100, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > > On Monday, 19 de January de 2015 at 15:32, Dave Tucker wrote: > > > > On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:04, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > > > Agreed. I would expect that OVN might lead to more frequent releases > > > of OVS with a more "st

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:25:22PM +, Dave Tucker wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2015, at 16:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > > >Wasn’t OVN to be developed in C too? > > That's what was being discussed here based on a comment earlier in the > thread. > I'm just exploring whether there is a reason to cons

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] pktbuf: Always initialize '*bufferp' even when 'pb == NULL'.

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:15:10PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 01/17/15 at 09:21am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Otherwise if a service connection (which does not have buffers) attempts > > to use buffers, '*bufferp' will be uninitialized, which can cause a > > segfault in the caller. > > > > Found usi

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] rconn: Remove dead code and data.

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 02:12:55PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 01/18/15 at 04:26pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > These functions had no callers, so remove them and the data maintained > > just to implement them. > > > > Found by inspection. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff > > Acked-by: Thomas Graf

Re: [ovs-dev] Master Slave Architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:32:52AM -0800, Gauri Bhutkar wrote: > I have mininet 2.2.0 with OVS 2.3.0 installed , I attached one switch to > more than one controller (Opendaylight) using script.I have referred this > link for the same. > http://windysdn.blogspot.in/ > I want to give read write acces

[ovs-dev] Processing of openvswitch_1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1_amd64.changes

2015-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
openvswitch_1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openvswitch_1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1.dsc openvswitch_1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1.debian.tar.gz openvswitch-common_1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1_amd64.deb openvswitch-

[ovs-dev] openvswitch_1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

2015-01-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping stable-proposed-updates to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 14:57:32 +0100 Source: openvswitch Binary: openvswitch-datapath-source openvswitch-datapath-dkms openvswitch-common openvswitch-switch openvswitch-ip

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/19/15 at 10:01am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I realize that a shared library was mentioned elsethread as having some > importance, but I don't understand why. ovn-controller and the other C > components of OVN will be just as useful whether they are statically or > dynamically linked to the OVS libr

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:38:48PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 01/19/15 at 10:01am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > I realize that a shared library was mentioned elsethread as having some > > importance, but I don't understand why. ovn-controller and the other C > > components of OVN will be just as usefu

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:07:52AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 01/19/15 at 09:58am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > To keep the discussion going, let's talk about each of those features. > > > > These days, OVS allows an ARP responder can be implemented in the > > OpenFlow flow table (since all ARP fields

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/19/15 at 09:58am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > To keep the discussion going, let's talk about each of those features. > > These days, OVS allows an ARP responder can be implemented in the > OpenFlow flow table (since all ARP fields are modifiable), but that has > only been true for a few versions. Be

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/19/15 at 09:19am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I really prefer feature negotiation in any case, because it means that > OVN can work with OVS that has custom version numbers or backports of > individual features. You are absolutely right. Thinking about this more, I guess we don't even have a choice a

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/19/15 at 03:13pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I think that this can be simply tested for with an OFPT_PACKET_OUT whose > packet is an ARP and whose actions modify ARP header fields and then > send the packet back to the controller. If the packet comes back in an > OFPT_PACKET_IN, with the requested A

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN architecture

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:18:59AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 01/19/15 at 09:19am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > I really prefer feature negotiation in any case, because it means that > > OVN can work with OVS that has custom version numbers or backports of > > individual features. > > You are absolute

[ovs-dev] location of vconn struct definitions

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
Commit 4a1f523f2d760 (lib: Move vconn.h to ) moved the definitions of struct vconn and struct pvconn from lib/ to include/openvswitch/ but I'm not sure why. The size and content of those structs is not obviously part of the ABI. Can you remind why? Thanks, Ben. _

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] stream-fd: Fix log message.

2015-01-19 Thread Ben Pfaff
The log message for a send operation should refer to "send", not "recv". Looks like an old cut-and-paste error. Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff --- lib/stream-fd.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/stream-fd.c b/lib/stream-fd.c index a6a10d4..2cb4b4c 100644 ---

[ovs-dev] (no subject)

2015-01-19 Thread roman Cabrera
javascript:void(0) ___ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

[ovs-dev] (no subject)

2015-01-19 Thread roman Cabrera
The dev Archives You can get more information about this list. ArchiveView by:Downloadable versionJanuary 2015:[ Thread ] [ Subject ] [ Author ] [ Date ][ Gzip'd Text 665 KB ]December 2014:[ Thread ] [ Subject ] [ Author ] [ Date ][ Gzip'd Text 759 KB ]November 2014:[ Thread ] [ Subject ] [ Autho