I don't know anyone who uses Thunderbird. I never have. I'm not going
to switch for this.
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:26:05PM +, Andrew Kampjes wrote:
> So the way that I would see this working, is the security team would have
> upto maybe 4 people on it.
>
> If a researcher just sends the r
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 12:29:48PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> From: Amit Bose
>
> Cflags in pkg-config files sets the include path to $PREFIX/openflow,
> $PREFIX/openvswitch. This makes the including source files use the files
> like
> include
> instead of
> include
>
> Signed-off-by: Ami
Thanks! Applied.
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:01:23AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
>
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > ---
> > FAQ.md | 41 +
> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:54:42PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> With the small nits below:
>
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
Thanks. I fixed up everything you mentioned and applied this to master.
I gave details below; the only bit where I think you might want followup
is on the treatment of O
These patches fix an assertion failure when very large (approximately 64
kB) packets are sent to userspace through a network device with a very
large MTU. This bug was originally reported through the new security
vulnerability management process, but we decided during the process that
the severity
Until now the Netlink code has considered an attribute to exceed the
maximum length if the *padded* size of the attribute exceeds 65535 bytes.
For example, an attribute with a 65529-byte payload, together with 4-byte
header and 3 bytes of padding, takes up 65536 bytes and therefore the
existing cod
A packet sent to a Netlink datapath has to fit within a Netlink attribute.
Until now, this was only checked in an assertion inside the Netlink code,
which meant that trying to send a too-large packet (approximate 64 kB or
larger) would assert-fail. It's better to just drop those packets, which
thi
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:50:23PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> These patches fix an assertion failure when very large (approximately 64
> kB) packets are sent to userspace through a network device with a very
> large MTU. This bug was originally reported through the new security
> vulnerability mana
Well if no-one wants to use it, then I'll remove the GPG parts and call it
good-enough.
On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 06:26:43 Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I don't know anyone who uses Thunderbird. I never have. I'm not going
> to switch for this.
>
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:26:05PM +, Andrew Kampjes wro