On 31 August 2013 05:45, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what is the actual symbol that we're finding in the RT
> kernel?
Its not about RT kernel really..
Following patch did this:
b0e380b [SK_BUFF]: unions of just one member don't get anything done, kill them
diff --git a/include/linu
We talk recently about harmonizing tunnels so they behave consistently wrt. SKB
orphaning, cleaning netfilter state, etc.
The goal of this serie is to achieve this.
Note that I test only ipip, sit and ip6_tunnels modules.
v2: add patch 2/5
rebase on head
remove 'RFC' prefix
drivers/net/
The goal of this patch is to harmonize cleanup done on a skbuff on rx path.
Before this patch, behaviors were different depending of the tunnel type.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel
---
include/net/dst.h | 12 +++-
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 3 +--
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 3 +--
net/ip
This argument is not used, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 3 +--
include/net/ip_tunnels.h| 3 +--
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c| 3 +--
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c | 3 +--
net/ipv6/sit.c | 4 ++--
net/openvswitch/vport-gre.c | 2
This argument is not used, let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 8
include/net/vxlan.h | 2 +-
net/openvswitch/vport-vxlan.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/
This function was only used when a packet was sent to another netns. Now, it can
also be used after tunnel encapsulation or decapsulation.
Only skb_orphan() should not be done when a packet is not crossing netns.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 +-
net/core/dev.c
The goal of this patch is to harmonize cleanup done on a skbuff on xmit path.
Before this patch, behaviors were different depending of the tunnel type.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 6 --
include/net/ip6_tunnel.h| 1 -
include/net/ip_tunnels.h| 2 +-
I applied the groups implementation originally contributed Centec to
master now. Simon and Jarno also contributed to this
implementation. Thanks a lot to all of you!
Casey, the new implementation undoubtedly has flaws. If you want to
contribute improvements, that perhaps move closer to the impl
Our whole team are very glad to hear that!
We expect to contribute much more to community in the future.
Thanks,
Neil
-邮件原件-
发件人: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com]
发送时间: 2013年9月3日 0:35
收件人: dev@openvswitch.org
抄送: Neil Zhu; Simon Horman; Jarno Rajahalme; Casey Barker
主题: groups impleme
this patch looks fine and works for me. thanks.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
> Patch ports don't have datapath ports so it doesn't make sense to try to
> call dpif_port_del() on them. If we do try, it will fail, which makes the
> caller think that the port wasn't really deleted, which in turn keeps
> ofpro
10 matches
Mail list logo