On 05/24/13 at 03:18pm, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> My guess is that there isn't a real different for small packets since
> >> everything will be in the cache but it seems worth checking given that
> >> this is optimizing a rare case at the expens
Did you recieved my last mail?
Reply via email( davidangela...@gmail.com ) ___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 08:02 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> I ran TCP_CRR to verify the SYN/ACK use case and I did not
> observe a difference. If you have any specific test in mind
> I will be glad to run that before posting the 2nd revision.
I guess you should test with rx checksum disabled as well,
> I think the "if" test here cannot ever be true, because the loop
> un-set all of the bits in 'slow'. (I think that this was also the
> case before the patch.) Perhaps we should just delete it.
I've removed it from the patch. Looks good otherwise?
Ethan
___
