On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> I'd like to avoid having to wrap the serialization stuff when there is
>> something else that already works and is better, but if I have to I
>> will. Just looking for opinions on what I should do. Here's the test
>> failure output:
>
> Both for
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 04:12:45PM -0500, Terry Wilson wrote:
> I currently have a patch that adds a C extension module to wrap the
> in-tree JSON parser. It works with both Python 2 and 3. The
> performance increase is quite large. For example, parsing a 100Mb JSON
> file:
>
> Without extension
