Ben Pfaff wrote on 08/01/2016 03:05:20 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "dev@openvswitch.org" , Kyle Mestery/
> Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 08/01/2016 03:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
>
08/01/2016 12:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:00:17PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> > > When it comes to ovs-appctl, we're looking to set log level access
> only.
> > > Since this doe
Ben Pfaff wrote on 08/01/2016 12:49:16 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Kyle Mestery/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS, "dev@openvswitch.org"
>
> Date: 08/01/2016 12:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
>
>
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:00:17PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
>> When it comes to ovs-appctl, we're looking to set log level access only.
>> Since this doesn't really fit into what I think of when I see "--dry-run",
>> I'm wondering if this variati
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:00:17PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> When it comes to ovs-appctl, we're looking to set log level access only.
> Since this doesn't really fit into what I think of when I see "--dry-run",
> I'm wondering if this variation of the wrapper concept above
> would do the trick:
>
Kyle Mestery wrote on 08/01/2016 07:51:42 AM:
> From: Kyle Mestery
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff , "dev@openvswitch.org"
> , Kyle Mestery/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 08/01/2016 07:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl
> > Cc: Kyle Mestery/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS, dev@openvswitch.org
>> > > Date: 07/30/2016 04:06 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 02:22:07PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
Ben Pfaff wrote on 07/31/2016 11:53:15 AM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org, Kyle Mestery/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 07/31/2016 11:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
>
> On Sat, Jul 3
BM@IBMUS
> > > > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > > > Date: 07/30/2016 01:38 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:35:31PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
>
Ben Pfaff wrote on 07/30/2016 04:06:31 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Kyle Mestery/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS, dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 07/30/2016 04:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
>
> On Sat, Jul 3
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 02:22:07PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> Ben Pfaff wrote on 07/30/2016 01:38:27 PM:
>
> > From: Ben Pfaff
> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > Date: 07/30/2016 01:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Rea
Ben Pfaff wrote on 07/30/2016 01:38:27 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 07/30/2016 01:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:35:31PM -0500, Ryan Moats
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:35:31PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> Ben Pfaff wrote on 07/29/2016 05:27:29 PM:
>
> > From: Ben Pfaff
> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> > Date: 07/29/2016 05:27 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Rea
Ben Pfaff wrote on 07/29/2016 05:27:29 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 07/29/2016 05:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Read only versions of the *ctl binaries
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 04:11:00PM -0500, Ryan Moats w
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 04:11:00PM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
>
> We just received a new operational requirement that we have
> to restrict access to all binaries that provide RW access to
> infrastructure components, but yet still have the ability to
> read current state from the infrastructure.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
