On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Liran Schour wrote:
> OK. Andy, tell me when you post your changes so I will be able to base mine
> on top of yours.
>
I have got a version that seems to work. I plan to add more tests in
the next few days, then post them
for review.
In the mean time, I have pu
I am also very interested in the “where” clause in “monitor” for OpenSwitch use
and we intended to propose something similar.
Some questions:
What will we do when row A is the only reference to row B and row A doesn’t
pass the “where” condition?
Will A still be sent? or will B exist in IDL with
Ben Pfaff wrote on 15/10/2015 02:44:44 AM:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:57:38PM +0300, Liran Schour wrote:
> > Here is an update for the proposed OVSDB protocol specification (RFC
> > 7047)change suggested for overcoming OVN scalability issues by
allowing
> > clients to monitor only rows that m
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:57:38PM +0300, Liran Schour wrote:
> Here is an update for the proposed OVSDB protocol specification (RFC
> 7047)change suggested for overcoming OVN scalability issues by allowing
> clients to monitor only rows that meet specific criteria
> (http://openvswitch.org/pipe
