Awesome, I'll merge this.
Ethan
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:04, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:28:32AM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Here's an incremental.
>
> Thanks, it looks good.
>
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://open
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:28:32AM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Here's an incremental.
Thanks, it looks good.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Here's an incremental.
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 55 +++
ofproto/ofproto-provider.h |8 --
ofproto/ofproto.c |8 --
vswitchd/vswitch.xml |2 +-
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ofpr
> I wonder whether priority_node is the most informative possible name.
> Both "priority" and "node" are very generic computer science terms and
> so the name priority_node doesn't pop out as being descriptive. Maybe
> something like "queue_marking", "qos_to_dscp", etc. would be more
> meaningful.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:29:36PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> The dscp column of the queue table instructs Open vSwitch to mark
> all traffic egressing the queue with the given DSCP bits in its tos
> field.
>
> Bug #7046.
Could you move the hmap_node to the start of struct priority_node?
hmap_
