On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:18:41PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > The worker process implementation isn't thread-safe and, once OVS
> > itself is threaded, it doesn't make much sense to have a worker
> > process anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The worker process implementation isn't thread-safe and, once OVS
> itself is threaded, it doesn't make much sense to have a worker
> process anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
>
Looks good.
> ---
> vswitchd/system-stats.c | 145
>
