On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:07:59AM +, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> Speaking of licenses, I've included the Apache 2.0 license header at the top
> of all reworked docs. Is this necessary?
I think that it is a good idea to do this. A fair number of projects
use different source and documentation l
On 2016-10-05 00:32, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:25:11AM +0900, Joe Stringer wrote:
On 2 October 2016 at 04:01, Stephen Finucane
wrote:
> This is essentially the output of 'sphinx-quickstart' but with parts of
> the Makefile merged into the existing Makefile.am and a license ad
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:25:11AM +0900, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 2 October 2016 at 04:01, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> > This is essentially the output of 'sphinx-quickstart' but with parts of
> > the Makefile merged into the existing Makefile.am and a license added
> > to the index.rst file.
> >
>
On 2 October 2016 at 04:01, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> This is essentially the output of 'sphinx-quickstart' but with parts of
> the Makefile merged into the existing Makefile.am and a license added
> to the index.rst file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane
> ---
> I need to know who to assign c
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 08:01:30PM +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> This is essentially the output of 'sphinx-quickstart' but with parts of
> the Makefile merged into the existing Makefile.am and a license added
> to the index.rst file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane
> ---
> I need to know w
